An experimental investigation on the effect of beam angle optimization on the reduction of beam numbers in IMRT of head and neck tumors

Abstract

In static intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the fundamental factors that determine the quality of a plan are the number of beams and their angles. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of beam angle optimization (BAO) on the beam number in IMRT. We used six head and neck cases to carry out the study. Basically the methodology uses a parameter called “Beam Intensity Profile Perturbation Score” (BIPPS) to determine the suitable beam angles in IMRT. We used two set of plans in which one set contains plans with equispaced beam configuration starting from beam numbers 3 to 18, and another set contains plans with optimal beam angles chosen using the in‐house BAO algorithm. We used quadratic dose‐based single criteria objective function as a measure of the quality of a plan. The objective function scores obtained for equispaced beam plans and optimal beam angle plans for six head and neck cases were plotted against the beam numbers in a single graphical plot for effective comparison. It is observed that the optimization of beam angles reduces the beam numbers required to produce clinically acceptable dose distribution in IMRT of head and neck tumors. Especially N0.1 (represents the beam number at which the objective function reaches a value of 0.1) is considerably reduced by beam angle optimization in almost all the cases included in the study. We believe that the experimental findings of this study will be helpful in understanding the interplay between beam angle optimization and beam number selection process in IMRT which, in turn, can be used to improve the performance of BAO algorithms and beam number selection process in IMRT.PACS number: 87.55.de

Knowledge‐based intensity‐modulated radiotherapy plans for cervical cancer with overlap volume of target and organs at risk

“…In addition, this study focused on the application of knowledge‐based plans and could not examine the quality of the plans themselves, as they could be affected by multiple factors, such as ray energy, number of fields, field angle, collimator angle, and bed angle. Studies have confirmed that the field angle has an influence on normal organs, and the ray angle has an influence on the radiotherapy quality . Sung et al.…”

“…Studies have confirmed that the field angle has an influence on normal organs, and the ray angle has an influence on the radiotherapy quality. [16][17][18] Sung et al found that the exposure dose to normal liver tissue of IMRT plans for five adjacent uneven fields was less than that of IMRT plans for five equational fields surrounding the target. 19 Therefore, K-IMRT should be used for the optimization of IMRT plans, and the field angle should be set manually In conclusion, K-IMRT is an application of big data.…”

A novel implementation of mARC treatment for non-dedicated planning systems using converted IMRT plans

“…In implementations similar to the Pinnacle planning system, where IMRT is performed with a maximum number of segments distributed over all beam angles, the method offers the possibility to investigate beam-angle-optimization, which is a non-trivial problem in modern IMRT planning (for some recent approaches to this problem, compare, e.g., [13-15]). In our approach, the directions for hybrid arcs need not be pre-defined by the user, but are determined by the inversion algorithm in a way that the TPS assigns segments to those beam directions where they are “most needed”.…”

Data mining to aid beam angle selection for intensity-modulated radiation therapy

“…First, the planners must decide how many beam angles to use. Research has shown that while more beam angles might spread out the radiation, ensuring no individual organ receives too high a dose, there are diminishing returns for too many angles [27,29,42,43]. In addition, there are practical limitations.…”