1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3472(85)80077-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental study of the foraging strategy of the wood ant Formica aquilonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This also made the ants positively phototactic. Because ants are known to obtain directional information from magnetic field lines (Camlitepe and Stradling, 1995;Camlitepe et al, 2005;Riveros and Srygley, 2008) and idiothetic cues (Cosens and Toussaint, 1985;Aksoy and Camlitepe, 2005), monochromatic test stimuli were interchanged after every fifteenth forager. Prior to each test, food was removed and the feeding boxes were replaced with clean empty ones.…”
Section: Elimination Of Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also made the ants positively phototactic. Because ants are known to obtain directional information from magnetic field lines (Camlitepe and Stradling, 1995;Camlitepe et al, 2005;Riveros and Srygley, 2008) and idiothetic cues (Cosens and Toussaint, 1985;Aksoy and Camlitepe, 2005), monochromatic test stimuli were interchanged after every fifteenth forager. Prior to each test, food was removed and the feeding boxes were replaced with clean empty ones.…”
Section: Elimination Of Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this recruitment process, the chemical trails deposited by foragers returning to the nest may stimulate trail following and serve as a guide to orient rapidly to the target area (see review by Passera, 1984;Beckers et al, 1989;H611dobler and Wilson, 1990). Competition between trail versus visual orientation (sun compass orientation, visual landmarks) during homing or food gathering has been investigated in some species belonging to the genera Pogonomyrmex (H611dobler, 1971; H611dobler, 1976), Camponotus (H611dobler et al, 1974; Klotz and Reid, 1992), Atta, Acromyrmex (Vilela et al, 1987;Jaffe et al, 1990), Formica (M6glich and H6tldobler, 1975;Henquell and Abdi, 1981;Cosens and Toussaint, 1985;Rosengren andFortelius, 1986, 1987;Fourcassi6 and Beugnon, 1988) and Lasius (Traniello, 1989). Visual and chemical orientation cues are used according to a hierarchy which depends upon the species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although volatiles from the herbivore itself would provide reliable information to the predator (Vet and Dicke, 1992;Wiskerke et al, 1993), the distribution of both predator species in the field was not related to the number of adult weevils captured in pheromone traps indicating that the aggregation pheromone released by male C. sordidus is not used by the predators in the field. In addition to the lack of response to the aggregation pheromone, generalist predators such as formicine ants have not been reported to use prey-derived chemicals as kairomones during foraging (Cosens and Toussaint, 1985). In contrast, several other predator species have been reported to use pheromones of their prey during prey searching and location (Dwumfour, 1992;Hedlund et al, 1996;Haberkern and Raffa, 2003;Steidle and van Loon, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%