An experimental study of the correlation between surface roughness and light scattering for rough metallic surfaces

Abstract

We present an experimental study of the angular distribution of light scattered from several rough metallic surfaces, which cover a range of roughness conditions. The substrate materials are steel or glass; roughened by bead-blasting, grinding, or etching; and aluminum-coated. The measured surface-roughness statistics are filtered by using a composite roughness model. The raw mechanical roughnesses range from 0.21µm to 2.66µm; the high-frequency small-scale roughnesses range from 0.13µm to 0.86µm. The optical wavelength is 550nm, so that the roughness-to-wavelength ratio is of order one. A BRDF model based on the Kirchhoff approximation is used to establish a relationship between surface-height statistics and the angular distribution of the scattered light. Angular distributions calculated with the BRDF model are fit to the measurements. The best-fit roughness statistics from the BRDF model agree closely with those measured for the high-frequency small-scale roughness component. The latter roughness component, which has the highest surface slopes, is thus the primary contributor to the angular distribution of the reflected light. We show that the Kirchhoff approximation can be applied to rough metallic surfaces that have multiple scales of roughness and near-, but not perfect, Gaussian surface-height distributions.

Sparse grid collocation schemes for stochastic natural convection problems

“…The surface roughness correlation function is given in Fig. 27 (taken from [42]). The corresponding eigenspectrum is given in Fig.…”

Statistical model of rough surface contact accounting for size-dependent plasticity and asperity interaction

“…While many surfaces do exhibit fractal roughness, a description with Gaussian statistics is a well-accepted approximation of rough surfaces, see e.g. Li and Torrance (2005) . Apart from the different statistics of the surface roughness, the GW model is built on numerous simplifying assumptions and therefore has limitations in comparison with Persson's theory.…”

Strain gradient plasticity analysis of elasto-plastic contact between rough surfaces

“…For a smooth surface, = ∞ l s . Random roughness with Gaussian statistics is a well-accepted approximation of many real rough surfaces (Li and Torrance, 2005). An example of a randomly rough surface generated numerically with the method of Garcia and Stoll (1984) is shown in Fig.…”