1987
DOI: 10.1080/10584609.1987.9962812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental study of the influence of religious elites on public opinion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although far from perfect, the data represent responses from real congregants experiencing real political cues from their own congregation leaders. This provides a very different environment for evaluating the effect of clergy political messages, when compared to telephone surveys, experimental manipulations, or student convenience samples (Calfano and Djupe 2009; McKeown and Carlson 1987; Sears 1986; Djupe and Gwiasda 2010). The data here provide a look at how the effects of providential beliefs are conditioned by clergy political cues in the context of sermons delivered over a long period of time, which may or may not be heard or remembered by congregants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although far from perfect, the data represent responses from real congregants experiencing real political cues from their own congregation leaders. This provides a very different environment for evaluating the effect of clergy political messages, when compared to telephone surveys, experimental manipulations, or student convenience samples (Calfano and Djupe 2009; McKeown and Carlson 1987; Sears 1986; Djupe and Gwiasda 2010). The data here provide a look at how the effects of providential beliefs are conditioned by clergy political cues in the context of sermons delivered over a long period of time, which may or may not be heard or remembered by congregants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet despite the growing trend of religious appeals in political campaigns, scant work has appeared at the individual level to assess the effects of those appeals. Furthermore, extant research has only investigated religious appeals from male sources (Calfano and Djupe 2009; Djupe and Calfano 2009; McKeown and Carlson 1987). The question we address in this article, therefore, is whether the gender of the source affects the reception and translation of religious campaign appeals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies (Davidson, 1989; Wald, 1992) suggested, moreover, that the change in Catholic opinion was short lived, as Catholic opinion merged with non‐Catholic opinion on defense issues within two years of the peace pastoral. Addressing this issue experimentally, McKeown and Carlson (1987) found that Catholic college students were no more likely than evangelical Protestant students to adopt positions on a number of issues consistent with the bishops' pastoral letters when the source was attributed to “the American Catholic Bishops” than otherwise. Overall, the research that addresses directly the influence of the U.S. bishops on Catholic opinion suggests that this influence is limited at best.…”
Section: Religious Elites and Influence On Mass Opinionmentioning
confidence: 98%