2014
DOI: 10.26634/jste.2.4.2752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental Study on High Strength Concrete using Fly Ash and Alccofine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FRP is a brittle material that has linear elastic behavior up to failure. The usage of both conventional steel bars and FRP bars/grids might be an advantage of combining the two behaviors to enhance the overall concrete element's strength and ductility Most of the published research [9,11,14,15,[17][18][19] was focused on the performance of reinforced concrete elements reinforced by FRP bars under monotonic loading. The Inclusion of FRP grids in high strength concrete elements is very limited and the behavior of such beams under reverse cyclic loading is also limited and need more investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FRP is a brittle material that has linear elastic behavior up to failure. The usage of both conventional steel bars and FRP bars/grids might be an advantage of combining the two behaviors to enhance the overall concrete element's strength and ductility Most of the published research [9,11,14,15,[17][18][19] was focused on the performance of reinforced concrete elements reinforced by FRP bars under monotonic loading. The Inclusion of FRP grids in high strength concrete elements is very limited and the behavior of such beams under reverse cyclic loading is also limited and need more investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it was recognized that high strength alone is not an efficient way of attaining high performance. e endurance of these ingredients in different settings necessitates detailed research to find a suitable alternative [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%