2015
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2015/13233.6287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental Study to Evaluate the Effect of Memantine in Animal Models of Anxiety in Swiss Albino Mice

Abstract: Background: Due to the adverse effects produced by the present conventional medicines for anxiety disorders, research for newer drugs is still desirable. From the literature it is evident that NMDA receptors play a key role in animal models of anxiety.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, the results suggest that regulation of histaminergic and dopaminergic systems selectively modulated RRBs in BTBR mice. In contrast with a previous study [ 75 ], MEM failed to show significant anxiolytic effects in the open field test, a discrepancy that may be explained with the difference in dose regimen or anxiety level state in different mouse strains. Moreover, the failure of ST-2223 (at all doses), MEM and ARP to restore the hyperactivity observed in BTBR mice may have been due to the excitatory (Glu) and inhibitory (GABA) neurotransmitter imbalance which is well known to exist, as such an imbalance was observed in several clinical trials in patients with ASD [ 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the results suggest that regulation of histaminergic and dopaminergic systems selectively modulated RRBs in BTBR mice. In contrast with a previous study [ 75 ], MEM failed to show significant anxiolytic effects in the open field test, a discrepancy that may be explained with the difference in dose regimen or anxiety level state in different mouse strains. Moreover, the failure of ST-2223 (at all doses), MEM and ARP to restore the hyperactivity observed in BTBR mice may have been due to the excitatory (Glu) and inhibitory (GABA) neurotransmitter imbalance which is well known to exist, as such an imbalance was observed in several clinical trials in patients with ASD [ 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…3B1 ) as compared to the control condition in the open field test at 6 hours after the Anesthesia/Surgery. These findings suggest that the Anesthesia/Surgery altered the natural behavior of the mice, e.g., anxiety (time spent in the center 20 21 22 ) and natural reaction (freezing time 23 ). Note that these behaviors also require the presence and intactness of attention, consciousness and organized thinking in the mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…On day 21 of the experiment, each rat was habituated by being placed in the centre of the apparatus for 5 minutes and the test was performed on the following day (day 22, that is, 24 hours after exposure to the last stress session) . The rats were placed in the centre of the open field box, total movement was tracked for 5 minutes, and analyzed to evaluate anxiety behaviour as measured by the number of central entries, the time spent in the centre of the open field, total distance travelled, number of rearing (standing upright on the hind leg), grooming times, freezing times (absence of any movement), and total locomotor activity . Greater scores of freezing behaviour, fewer entries, as well as lower numbers and shorter lengths of time spent in the central area or in the inner area reflected decreased exploratory activity and increased anxiety .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 on the hind leg), grooming times, freezing times (absence of any movement), and total locomotor activity. 36 Greater scores of freezing behaviour, fewer entries, as well as lower numbers and shorter lengths of time spent in the central area or in the inner area reflected decreased exploratory activity and increased anxiety. 9,15 Finally, the total distance travelled was used as a measure of locomotor activity.…”
Section: Open Field Testmentioning
confidence: 99%