2001
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.7265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental Test of the Ion Condensation Theory for Spherical Colloidal Particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure compares experimental data of pulse amplitude recorded at two values of pH, 8 and 5.5. At the weakly acidic solution, the surface charge density is expected to be lower due to lower degree of carboxyl groups’ deprotonation . Our experiments (Figures and ) confirm the predictions: at the solution with higher pH, the difference in the magnitude of Δ I / I measured in the directions from base to tip and tip-to-base is higher than at pH 5.5.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure compares experimental data of pulse amplitude recorded at two values of pH, 8 and 5.5. At the weakly acidic solution, the surface charge density is expected to be lower due to lower degree of carboxyl groups’ deprotonation . Our experiments (Figures and ) confirm the predictions: at the solution with higher pH, the difference in the magnitude of Δ I / I measured in the directions from base to tip and tip-to-base is higher than at pH 5.5.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…At the weakly acidic solution, the surface charge density is expected to be lower due to lower degree of carboxyl groups' deprotonation. 55 Our experiments (Figures 3 and 6) confirm the predictions: at the solution with higher pH, the difference in the magnitude of ΔI/I measured in the directions from base to tip and tip-to-base is higher than at pH 5.5. Note that the modeling shown in Figure 5a also provides an explanation for the weak pH dependence of the current blockage in the direction from base to tip (Figure 3b); when the surface charge density increased from 0 to −0.04 C/m 2 , the predicted blockage increased only from ∼0.065 to 0.075.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Since the two types of studied particles were carboxylated, the increase of pH was expected to lead to the increase of their surface charge density. 38 However, we were surprised to observe that the highly charged particles (400 nm in diameter, red traces in Figure 1) caused a larger current decrease than the weakly charged or uncharged particles (blue and green traces in Figure 1). The difference was especially pronounced at pH 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Experiments were performed with two types of charged colloids that differed in their surface charge density by a factor of 3. The more charged colloids were previously reported to undergo the effect of ion condensation, leading to lowering the particle zeta potential and significant slowing down of the translocation . Here we present experimental data claiming that the kinetics of deprotonation/protonation of the colloids with condensed ions is significantly slower than what could be predicted based on previous experiments , and can exceed 100 ms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 51%