1977
DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(77)90501-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental-theoretical correlation study of non-linear bending and torsion deformations of a cantilever beam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the first comparisons of the Hodges-Dowell theory with the experiments [15] showed significant deficiencies of the moderate deformation nonlinear beam theory at the largest experimental loading conditions. Rosen and Friedmann [17], using an improved, 3rd-order nonlinear beam formulation showed considerable improvement, but this approach is still subject to the limitations of a theory developed using an ordering scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the first comparisons of the Hodges-Dowell theory with the experiments [15] showed significant deficiencies of the moderate deformation nonlinear beam theory at the largest experimental loading conditions. Rosen and Friedmann [17], using an improved, 3rd-order nonlinear beam formulation showed considerable improvement, but this approach is still subject to the limitations of a theory developed using an ordering scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static data from the experiment has been widely used (e.g., [15,16]), to evaluate nonlinear beam theories -not always with satisfactory results. Note that the first comparisons of the Hodges-Dowell theory with the experiments [15] showed significant deficiencies of the moderate deformation nonlinear beam theory at the largest experimental loading conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is true not only at the micro-and nanoscale, but also for macroscopic structures such as airplane wings. 18,19 Consequently, an effort to predict the dynamics of the nonlinear response and the parameters governing it has recently gained momentum. [20][21][22] Nonlinearity in the dynamic response of mechanical structures can have a multitude of origins, 8,23 including transduction effects (actuation/detection), 21 material properties (nonlinear constitutive relations), 24 nonideal boundary conditions, 25,26 damping mechanisms, 27,28 adsorption/desorption processes, 29 and geometric/inertial effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those that do, often present calculations with simplified models whose correspondence with the experimental system is established at a qualitative level only [6][7][8][9][10][11]. In other cases, models are derived from first principles [12][13][14], and may sometimes provide good quantitative matches as well [15][16][17][18][19]: however, such systems are usually weakly nonlinear and have easily modeled physics (e.g., Euler-Bernoulli beams, possibly under axial loads, undergoing not-too-large oscillations, with possibly nonstandard boundary conditions [20]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%