2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An explainable machine learning algorithm for risk factor analysis of in-hospital mortality in sepsis survivors with ICU readmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guo et al [ 36 ] constructed a nomogram to predict in-hospital mortality for myocardial infarction patients (AUROC 0.803). Jiang et al [ 37 ] used machine learning to predict in-hospital mortality in sepsis survivors (sepsis: AUROC 0.732; nonsepsis: AUROC 0.830). Suresh et al [ 38 ] developed a multitask model (AUROC 0.869) for mortality prediction that outperformed global and separate models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guo et al [ 36 ] constructed a nomogram to predict in-hospital mortality for myocardial infarction patients (AUROC 0.803). Jiang et al [ 37 ] used machine learning to predict in-hospital mortality in sepsis survivors (sepsis: AUROC 0.732; nonsepsis: AUROC 0.830). Suresh et al [ 38 ] developed a multitask model (AUROC 0.869) for mortality prediction that outperformed global and separate models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As sepsis has gradually become an important difficulty and subject content in clinical medical research, clinical research on sepsis has also begun to increase, and many clinical treatment results have been obtained, and valuable diagnosis and treatment experience has been accumulated. Comprehensive progress and updates have also been made in terms of the definition of the nature of the disease, diagnosis and treatment, and treatment standards of sepsis [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, no studies were found that analyzed the problem of mortality within the ICU by age group. There are studies focused on specific diseases [15,23], but the features that most affect mortality and the thresholds involving a specific disease may be different from those that affect mortality in a general way. In addition, there are other factors that affect the results, such as the database, the selected variables, the predictor model, the data collection time window, or the defined age groups, among others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the cohort was selected, the next step was feature extraction. In this work, 33 clinical variables were considered, specifically those that had less than 20% empty data and were frequently used in ICU analysis [15]. Data from the first 24 h of each of the selected patient's first ICU stay were considered.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%