An Explication of HistCite TM : Updates, Modifications, and a Variety of Applications

Mateu

et al. 2023

Front. Public Health

In this study, a descriptive bibliometric analysis of the scientific production in the Web of Science on job insecurity perceived by teachers in pandemic situations was carried out. The result shows the growing interest in the topic with an upward trend with an annual growth of 41.52%. Forty-seven papers from 41 journals with 2,182 cited references were considered, with 149 researchers from 30 countries publishing at least one article. The country with the most publications was the United States, followed by Germany and Spain. The United States was the country with the most collaborations. A total of 95 institutions published papers, and the universities with the most registrations were Miami University and the University of the Basque Country, although York University and the University of the Basque Country had a higher overall citation coefficient (102 and 40, respectively). Of the 41 journals that have published on the topic, Frontiers in Education and the British Journal of Educational Psychology stood out in terms of their article numbers. However, this last one was superior in terms of the overall number of citations per year, followed by Frontiers of Psychology.

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

How much do we care about teacher job insecurity during the pandemic? A bibliometric review

Mateu

et al. 2023

Front. Public Health

“…It also allows describing published articles and measuring specific aspects related to them through the analysis of their bibliographic information (titles, authors, dates, etc.) (Wu and Tsai, 2022). Another program commonly used in performing scientific mapping analysis of scientific literature is Bibliometrix R, as it provides several tools for the development of quantitative studies in bibliometrics and scientometrics (Aria and Cuccurullo, 2017).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trends of publications on transformational leadership in nursing: a bibliometric analysis

Aydoğdu

2023

LHS

Purpose This study aims to analyze the structure of publications on transformational leadership in nursing and determine its evolution process through a bibliometric analysis. Design/methodology/approach It is a descriptive bibliometric study. Data were collected on October 24, 2022, from the Web of Science and analyzed using Excel, VOSviewer, HistCite and Bibliometrix R programs. Findings A total of 348 studies conducted by 962 authors and published between 1990 and 2021 were included. It was found that 84.5% of these publications were original articles and 97.7% were published in English. The studies are from 82 different journals and were carried out by researchers from 43 countries. The most productive country was the USA (n = 151). Research limitations/implications Only one database was used to search for studies. The searches were limited to the nursing category, and only studies published up to 2021 were included. Another important point is that, although there were no language limitations for the field literature search, English keywords were used; thus, the search can be considered semi-limited. It is believed that more comprehensive search strategies may generate different findings. Originality/value Two main themes were identified as the studies carried out in the field of transformational leadership in nursing, generally, directly or indirectly addressed the effects of this style of leadership either on nurses’ performance/job satisfaction or on quality care/patient safety; however, a gap was observed in the literature in the area of nursing education. Researchers can be inspired by the results of the present study, by learning about the focus of published research on transformational leadership, which will encourage them to plan new studies to improve nursing education, nursing care, nursing management and working conditions of nurses. Through the results of this study, it is also possible to learn about countries and researchers for possible collaborations in future studies.

“…Two bibliometric tools, HistCite Pro and VOSviewer, were used to analyze and show the data in this research. Histcite Pro is an updated version of HistCite developed in 2016 by Wang Qing (Wu & Tsai, 2022). HistCite Pro was a software application that enabled users to examine the historical influence of individual articles, authors, and journals by constructing citation networks and finding the most influential publications and authors on a subject.…”

Section: Bibliometric Softwarementioning

confidence: 99%

Tracing the Impact of Truscott's Controversial 1996 Paper on Grammar Correction: A Bibliometric Analysis

Lei¹

2023

ELT

Notwithstanding Truscott's 1996 review article sparked the grammatical correction debate, no earlier bibliometric analysis has focused on the publications that cited it. This study aimed to determine the degree to which publications citing Truscott's 1996 study had evolved and to give a conceptual framework for 427 papers. This study used two bibliometric programs, HistCite Pro and VOSviewer, to evaluate and display the data. The results visualized that the pro-correction side has prevailed and is influential in L2 writing practices.