2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2022.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An explicit stable finite difference method for the Allen–Cahn equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We call The nonlinearities in the PDE are trivial ( 3 u u − ) to deal with if we choose an explicit time integration method for the nonlinear part and backward time integration for the linear part, all the mathematical details for the nonlinear discretization of Allen Cahan equation is presented in subsection 3.1, we call this method a semi-implicit backward scheme. If we choose an explicit time integration method for Allen-Cahn equation, such as the Forward Euler finite difference, there is a strict restriction on the time step size to get convergence, for further details see [16]. Since the problem is a nonlinear dynamical system, for stability reasons, we propose taken explicitly a semi-implicit backward Euler scheme with the nonlinear part (as presented in subsection 3.1).…”
Section: Semi-implicit Method: Matrix Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We call The nonlinearities in the PDE are trivial ( 3 u u − ) to deal with if we choose an explicit time integration method for the nonlinear part and backward time integration for the linear part, all the mathematical details for the nonlinear discretization of Allen Cahan equation is presented in subsection 3.1, we call this method a semi-implicit backward scheme. If we choose an explicit time integration method for Allen-Cahn equation, such as the Forward Euler finite difference, there is a strict restriction on the time step size to get convergence, for further details see [16]. Since the problem is a nonlinear dynamical system, for stability reasons, we propose taken explicitly a semi-implicit backward Euler scheme with the nonlinear part (as presented in subsection 3.1).…”
Section: Semi-implicit Method: Matrix Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%