2018
DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2018.1449757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exploration into the impact of WebQuest-based classroom on EFL learners’ critical thinking and academic writing skills: a mixed-methods study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
56
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
56
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To conclude, it was established that there is a significant difference in students' critical thinking taught with WebQuest based instruction and conventional mode of teaching favoring the former. The results obtained were in correspondence with the studies done by Cigrik (2010), Zhou et al (2012), Auditor & Roleda (2014), Ahmed (2016) and Ebadi & Rahimi (2018). The null hypothesis that there will be no significant difference between critical thinking of students taught through WebQuest based instruction and conventional teaching strategy is therefore rejected.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…To conclude, it was established that there is a significant difference in students' critical thinking taught with WebQuest based instruction and conventional mode of teaching favoring the former. The results obtained were in correspondence with the studies done by Cigrik (2010), Zhou et al (2012), Auditor & Roleda (2014), Ahmed (2016) and Ebadi & Rahimi (2018). The null hypothesis that there will be no significant difference between critical thinking of students taught through WebQuest based instruction and conventional teaching strategy is therefore rejected.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For those receiving e-PF, effective e-PF not only generates their learning motivation but also provides them helpful guidance to identify the gaps between their own current learning abilities and their outcome expectations (Yang, 2016). From the identifications of both strengths and weaknesses in their own texts as well as the reflection on suggested concrete ideas to produce better pieces of work, they broaden and deepen their own thinking (Ebadi & Rahimi, 2018). The development of reflective thinking among e-PF receivers is facilitated when they reflect on their peers' suggestions and make decisions on whether accepting or rejecting these revisions (Ching & Hsu, 2016;Novakovich, 2016).…”
Section: E-peer Feedback and Reflective Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students are able to see themselves actively engaged in knowledge construction by sharing their pieces of work with a wider audience, managing their own learning, and refining what they have previously acquired through their critical reflection (Faizi, 2018). Against the face-to-face mode and paper-based feedback, e-PF not only facilitates argumentative interaction (Cheng et al, 2015;Ebadi & Rahimi, 2018;Noroozi & Hatami, 2019) but also increases the levels of validity and reliability of peer comments (Shang, 2019;Wu, 2019;Xu & Yu, 2018). E-PF creates a non-threatening environment where students with lower levels of proficiency are able to equally engage and contribute to the process of peer comments (Wu, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Chang, Chen, and Hsu (2011) studied 6th grade students’ ( N = 106) in an outdoor environmental education context and reported that the students who used Webquests performed better than a control group. Similarly, in an adult learning setting ( N = 20), Ebadi and Rahimi (2018) found that students who engaged with Webquests outperformed a control group in terms of critical thinking and academic writing. However, the literature on WebQuests also includes studies that suggest problems with learners not feeling comfortable with WebQuests ( Koc & Bakir, 2010 ), and preferring more traditional computer-assisted activities ( Peters, Weinberg, & Sarma, 2009 ), and that some teachers may implement WebQuests without fidelity to the intended model ( Dodge, 2001 ).…”
Section: Background and Literaturementioning
confidence: 91%