2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2013.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exploration of motivation and self-beliefs of first year students of German

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
45
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The data can then be used for determining the strength and relevance of each motive in driving self-motivation to become proficient, which is impossible when learners' motives are conflated by lumping them together in an overall scale score. This also circumvents problems with the internal consistency of ideal L2 self scales that presume the presence of a set of motives in a learner population (e.g., in learner populations where the integrative orientation is missing, as found in Busse, 2013). The flexibility of operationalizing the ideal L2 self as a single self-representation or a set of future selves which represent a range of motives that suit the research context is also highly beneficial in practical terms since L2 learner motivation is often studied as part of more complex inquiries, which impose clear limitations on the depth in which each variable can be considered.…”
Section: A Measure For Inquiring Into Specific Properties Of Learnersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data can then be used for determining the strength and relevance of each motive in driving self-motivation to become proficient, which is impossible when learners' motives are conflated by lumping them together in an overall scale score. This also circumvents problems with the internal consistency of ideal L2 self scales that presume the presence of a set of motives in a learner population (e.g., in learner populations where the integrative orientation is missing, as found in Busse, 2013). The flexibility of operationalizing the ideal L2 self as a single self-representation or a set of future selves which represent a range of motives that suit the research context is also highly beneficial in practical terms since L2 learner motivation is often studied as part of more complex inquiries, which impose clear limitations on the depth in which each variable can be considered.…”
Section: A Measure For Inquiring Into Specific Properties Of Learnersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with self-discrepancy theory, D€ ornyei argues that it motivates engagement in L2 learning insofar as "if the person we would like to become speaks an L2 [ …], the ideal L2 self is a powerful motivator to learn the L2 because we would like to reduce the discrepancy between our actual and ideal selves" (in D€ ornyei & Chan, 2013:438). Indeed, the empirical validity of the ideal L2 self and its links with motivated L2 learning behaviour have been evidenced by a substantial body of research, including larger correlational studies (e.g., Al-Shehri, 2009;Csiz er & Kormos, 2009;D€ ornyei & Chan, 2013;Kim and Kim, 2014;Kormos, Kiddle, & Csiz er, 2011;Papi, 2010;Ryan, 2009;Taguchi, Magid, & Papi, 2009), qualitative work (e.g., Hsieh, 2009;Lamb, 2011) and an increasing number of mixed method inquiries (e.g., Busse, 2013;Sampson, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e.g. the papers in Dörnyei & Ushioda, 2009, as well as Busse, 2013;Csizér & Lukács, 2010;Henry, 2009Henry, , 2010Henry, , 2011Hiver, 2013;Islam, Lamb, & Chambers, 2013;Kormos, Kiddle, & Csizér, 2011;Lamb, 2012;Magid, 2012;Papi, 2010;Papi & Teimouri, 2012) and the Ideal L2 Self has time and again been found to be a central motivating factor: a focused, personal and realistic vision of a possible future.…”
Section: Vision In the L2 Classroommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graham 2003), hampering both effort and achievement (e.g. Busse 2013;Williams et al 2002); even at post compulsory stage, few anglophone school students have good confidence in their language learning ability (Graham 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%