As pediatricians, we set the stage for patients' future relationships with health care professionals; nowhere are the stakes higher than sexual and reproductive health care. Listening to young people and respecting their priorities imparts a valuable lesson about self-advocacy within health care. Reproductive health is one of the most important aspects of patients' personal lives, and we should model respectful, compassionate, and evidence-based care. This means integrating reproductive justice into our clinical practice.Reproductive justice asserts that every person has "the human right to maintain personal bodily autonomy, have children, not have children, and parent the children we have in safe and sustainable communities." 1 Developed in 1994 by Women of African Descent for Reproductive Justice, this framework answers the call for a more expansiveunderstandingofreproductiveautonomythanthe individualistic focus of other frameworks developed in response to threats to reproductive freedom. For example, reproductive health addresses the provision of clinical services to an individual, while reproductive rights focus on the legal protection of the right to certain services, including abortion. In contrast, reproductive justice brings a societal and structural lens to "understand and root out reproductive oppression to achieve human rights and social justice." 1 This broader view recognizes that communities that historically have been marginalized bear a disproportionate burden of constraints on reproductive autonomy. These burdens include limited access to contraception and abortion care, as well as forced and coerced sterilization, carried out by medical professional and government institutions in the name of public health and reduction of poverty. 2 As pediatricians, comprehensive contraceptive counseling has become the standard of care, and many clinicians have focused on increasing access to longacting reversible contraception and promoting its use via tiered efficacy counseling. 3,4 Many pediatricians express concern about the age of patients making reproductive choices and, as such, advocate for long-acting reversible contraception in all adolescent patients. While this may be discussed flippantly, real harm is perpetuated by prioritizing public health goals over an individual patient's reproductive goals and bodily autonomy. The paternalistic belief that an adolescent's top priority should be to delay childbearing is fraught with the potential for implicit bias and further entrenchment of stratified reproduction, by which the fertility of certain patients is valued over others.While institutionalized policies of forced sterilization are no longer legal, more subtly coercive attempts to influence contraceptive decision-making still occur by providing financial incentives, pressuring patients to choose specific contraceptive methods, or refusing to remove long-acting reversible contraception until after a trial