An exploration of supervision delivered via clinical video
                        telehealth (CVT).

Jordan, Shiloh E.; Shearer, Erika M.

doi:10.1037/tep0000245

Cited by 47 publications

(76 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A positive prior experience with technology [ 115 , 116 ], mental health services [ 54 , 74 , 104 , 117 - 119 ], and mental health technology [ 72 , 120 , 121 ] facilitated people’s intention to use interventions, as well as actual engagement. A negative prior experience formed a barrier to engaging with a DMHI [ 74 , 117 , 122 ], whereas a positive experience increased participants’ engagement [ 54 , 72 , 104 , 115 , 116 , 118 - 121 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs), which deliver mental health support via technologies such as mobile apps, can increase access to mental health support, and many studies have demonstrated their effectiveness in improving symptoms. However, user engagement varies, with regard to a user’s uptake and sustained interactions with these interventions. Objective This systematic review aims to identify common barriers and facilitators that influence user engagement with DMHIs. Methods A systematic search was conducted in the SCOPUS, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Empirical studies that report qualitative and/or quantitative data were included. Results A total of 208 articles met the inclusion criteria. The included articles used a variety of methodologies, including interviews, surveys, focus groups, workshops, field studies, and analysis of user reviews. Factors extracted for coding were related to the end user, the program or content offered by the intervention, and the technology and implementation environment. Common barriers included severe mental health issues that hampered engagement, technical issues, and a lack of personalization. Common facilitators were social connectedness facilitated by the intervention, increased insight into health, and a feeling of being in control of one’s own health. Conclusions Although previous research suggests that DMHIs can be useful in supporting mental health, contextual factors are important determinants of whether users actually engage with these interventions. The factors identified in this review can provide guidance when evaluating DMHIs to help explain and understand user engagement and can inform the design and development of new digital interventions.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In training settings, however, clinical training, supervision, and other larger systems (e.g., university and departmental policies) must also be considered. At present, research addressing the latter three systems is scarce, with the most attention dedicated to online supervision (e.g., Jordan & Shearer, 2019; Twist et al, 2016). For many supervisors, the transition to online supervision was unanticipated and required rapid adaptation to structural changes while still attending to trainees’ needs (Sahebi, 2020).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The transition to teletherapy in marriage and family therapy training settings during COVID‐19: What do the data tell us?

Morgan

Landers

Simpson

et al. 2021

J Marital Family Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the wake of the COVID‐19 pandemic, little is known about how university training programs transitioned to teletherapy. This study describes the transition of two university marriage and family therapy (i.e., master's and doctoral) training clinics to teletherapy and presents preliminary analyses of the types of clients and cases that converted to teletherapy. A series of chi‐square analyses, a t‐test, a logistic regression model, and a multiple linear regression model were employed. Four key findings emerged: (1) most cases converted to teletherapy; (2) Hispanic ethnicity was the only demographic characteristic to significantly predict conversion to teletherapy; (3) individual cases were significantly more likely to convert to teletherapy than relational cases; and (4) the number of prior in‐person sessions attended significantly predicted conversion to teletherapy. Teletherapy conversion implications are discussed across four systemic levels: client, student trainee, supervision, and larger systems.

show abstract

“…One benefit of the enhanced use of technology during the COVID‐19 pandemic is the increased use of tele‐supervision. In‐person and remote supervision has been found to be equivalent in rapport and management of clinical issues (Jordan & Shearer, 2019). This format allows supervisors and trainees not in the same location to meet remotely, thereby reducing time and cost of travel.…”

Section: Impact Of Telehealth On Interdisciplinary Team Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Telehealth transition in a comprehensive care unit for eating disorders: Challenges and long‐term benefits

Datta

Derenne

Sanders

et al. 2020

Intl J Eating Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has forced many eating disorder medical stabilization units to consider adjustments that uphold both the quality of care delivered to patients while also observing social distancing public health directives for patients and staff. To date, inpatient facilities for eating disorders (both medical stabilization units and higher level of care facilities) have not needed to consider how to translate services to electronic platforms, given that most of these programs have in-person staff. We outline our transition to telehealth broadly, emphasizing some unexpected benefits of using telehealth services that we plan on integrating into our work-flow post COVID-19. These may be useful for other higher level of care eating disorder programs, including medical stabilization units, residential, partial hospitalization, and intensive outpatient programs. We also highlight aspects of transition that have been more challenging for this particular patient population, warranting the need for in-person services.

show abstract

An exploration of supervision delivered via clinical video telehealth (CVT).

Cited by 47 publications

References 17 publications

Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review

Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review

The transition to teletherapy in marriage and family therapy training settings during COVID‐19: What do the data tell us?

Telehealth transition in a comprehensive care unit for eating disorders: Challenges and long‐term benefits

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About