2013
DOI: 10.1037/a0029920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exploration of the Functions of Religious Monumental Architecture from a Darwinian Perspective

Abstract: In recent years, the cognitive science of religion has displayed a keen interest in religions' social function, bolstering research on religious prosociality and cooperativeness. The main objective of this article is to explore, from a Darwinian perspective, the biological and psychological mechanisms through which religious monumental architecture (RMA) might support that specific function. A frequently held view is that monumental architecture is a costly signal that served vertical social stratification in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In psychological studies on awe, pictures and clips of vast natural scenes and phenomena (e.g., grand waterfalls, huge mountain ranges) are often used to provoke awe (Saroglou, Buxant & Tilquin, 2008;Rudd, Vohs, & Aaker, 2012;Joye & Bolderdijk, 2015;Piff et al, 2015), and experiences of nature have been listed as amongst the most frequent elicitors of awe (Shiota, Keltner, & Mossman, 2007). Given their enormous scale and height it should come as no surprise that instances of monumental architectural structures (e.g., cathedrals) are also often pinpointed as potential man-made elicitors of awe (Keltner & Haidt, 2003;Joye & Verpooten, 2013;Díaz-Vera, 2015;Piff et al, 2015).…”
Section: Up Speeds You Down 4 2003mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In psychological studies on awe, pictures and clips of vast natural scenes and phenomena (e.g., grand waterfalls, huge mountain ranges) are often used to provoke awe (Saroglou, Buxant & Tilquin, 2008;Rudd, Vohs, & Aaker, 2012;Joye & Bolderdijk, 2015;Piff et al, 2015), and experiences of nature have been listed as amongst the most frequent elicitors of awe (Shiota, Keltner, & Mossman, 2007). Given their enormous scale and height it should come as no surprise that instances of monumental architectural structures (e.g., cathedrals) are also often pinpointed as potential man-made elicitors of awe (Keltner & Haidt, 2003;Joye & Verpooten, 2013;Díaz-Vera, 2015;Piff et al, 2015).…”
Section: Up Speeds You Down 4 2003mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animals exploit this bias in so-called dominance/threat displays, where they attempt to threat and ward off rivals through selfaggrandizement (e.g., by extending arms and legs, by pilo-erection;De Waal, 1982). Recent research has interpreted certain instances of monumental architecture as built threat displays (Joye & Verpooten, 2013), through which rulers and elites sought to intimidate potential rivals and to consolidate their superior position with respect to commoners (Neiman, 1998).…”
Section: Behavioral Immobility Reflects Freezingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In turn, this would affect how one feels about others with whom the experience is shared. Meaningful environments-such as the monumental architecture of religious centers of worship-may enhance the specialness of the ritual, further increasing a sense of group connectedness (e.g., Joye & Verpooten, 2013). In other words, doing a ritual in a mosque or temple would elicit greater cohesion compared with doing the exact same ritual in a more mundane, less awe-inspiring setting .…”
Section: Affiliating With Group Members: Performing Collective Ritualsmentioning
confidence: 99%