2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10798-019-09503-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exploration of the variables contributing to graphical education students’ CAD modelling capability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A sketch can be a few lines on a paper or it can be a more developed drawing of something. Sketches are primarily used as support and a tool for the design process (Delahunty et al, 2020). In engineering graphics courses, teaching sketches is suggested to start the course, to improve the students' ability of visualization (Jerz, 2002).…”
Section: Design and Design Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A sketch can be a few lines on a paper or it can be a more developed drawing of something. Sketches are primarily used as support and a tool for the design process (Delahunty et al, 2020). In engineering graphics courses, teaching sketches is suggested to start the course, to improve the students' ability of visualization (Jerz, 2002).…”
Section: Design and Design Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tradition is also used in post-primary schools, targeting on teaching how to use the software (McGarr & Seery, 2011). However, today, core contents of technology education are based on creativity and design and perhaps other methods for teaching CAD are better suited than a traditional pedagogy (Delahunty et al, 2020). Alternative CAD pedagogies are teaching how a CAD system works instead of teaching CAD through a specific task (Menary & Robinson, 2011).…”
Section: Teaching Cadmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…New technology subjects (Design and Communication Graphics and Technology) at Leaving Certificate level were introduced in 2007, and provided a radical curricular shift to design-based education as part of a general educational alignment (Seery et al, 2011). Despite this, there still remains aspects of the vocational heritage of these subjects through the preservation of hegemonic instructional practices (Delahunty et al, 2020). As McGarr (2011, p. 127) notes, "similar beliefs [about the value of technology education] exist within society where it continues to be seen as a masculine subject and suited to the more 'non-academic' students and those that are increasingly disengaged with school."…”
Section: Sociohistorical Issues and Subject Monopoliesmentioning
confidence: 99%