2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exploratory analysis of relationships between socioeconomic, land use, activity participation variables and travel patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
0
15

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
26
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…This view is also reflects a long-standing body of theory on the relationship between the built environment and the transport sector (Cervero and Kockelman, 1997;Ewing and Cervero, 2010). Specifically, Banister (2005) identified six groups of key factors that interconnect the built environment and transport: settlement size (Hickman and Banister, 2007;Naess, 2009); urban density (Oakes et al, 2007;Liu et al, 2014;Soria-Lara and Valenzuela-Montes, 2014); land use diversity (Pitombo et al, 2010;Song and Knaap, 2004;; urban design; local accessibility (Cervero et al, 2009); and finally the provision of parking (Albert and Mahalel, 2006). Supported by the abovementioned issues, there has been a proliferation of studies based on correlating transport CO 2 emissions and built environment factors as an initial step to designing transport policy packages for CO 2 mitigation (Bart, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This view is also reflects a long-standing body of theory on the relationship between the built environment and the transport sector (Cervero and Kockelman, 1997;Ewing and Cervero, 2010). Specifically, Banister (2005) identified six groups of key factors that interconnect the built environment and transport: settlement size (Hickman and Banister, 2007;Naess, 2009); urban density (Oakes et al, 2007;Liu et al, 2014;Soria-Lara and Valenzuela-Montes, 2014); land use diversity (Pitombo et al, 2010;Song and Knaap, 2004;; urban design; local accessibility (Cervero et al, 2009); and finally the provision of parking (Albert and Mahalel, 2006). Supported by the abovementioned issues, there has been a proliferation of studies based on correlating transport CO 2 emissions and built environment factors as an initial step to designing transport policy packages for CO 2 mitigation (Bart, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Buys and Miller [25] demonstrated that utilitarian and psycho-social elements such as travel purpose and time-efficiency were strongly related to urban residents' travel mode choice. Parking charges [26], activity participation [27], and multiple identities [28] also had an effect on residents' travel mode. Paulssen et al [29] suggested that personal values and individual attitudes impact travel mode choices.…”
Section: Travel Mode Choicementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The transportation issue explored is a comparison of travel demand patterns of men and women in Israel. Pitombo et al (2011) analyzed relationships between socioeconomic, land use, activity participation and travel patterns with Decision Tree (Classification and Regression Tree algorithm) modelling.…”
Section: Data Mining and Travel Mode Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%