An exploratory examination of additional ground access trips generated by airport ‘meeter-greeters’

Abstract

A significant share of airport passengers are accompanied to and/or from the airport by friends and relatives to wave them off or greet them when they land. At some airports the number of these 'meeter-greeters' can be substantial, which can have important ground access planning, economic and environmental implications for the airport operator. Yet this group have received comparatively little attention in either the academic or industry literature. Consequently, to some extent 'meetergreeters' have remained something of a 'hidden' element of ground access user. In an attempt to address this, the paper uses secondary data analysis of the UK CAA Passenger Survey Report to explore 'meeter-greeters' at five UK airports; Heathrow, Gatwick, Manchester, Stansted and Luton. Focus is given to assessing the scale of 'meeter-greeter' journeys and the role of a passenger's trip purpose (business/leisure) and resident status (resident/non-resident) in this process. A key finding from the analysis relates to the disproportionate impact of multi-person trips, where a number of different 'meeter-greeters' accompany a passenger to the airport. The implications of these findings are discussed and a number of recommendations for decision makers proposed. Namely, it is suggested that airport monitoring and assessment procedures should incorporate a measure of the additional trip generation by 'meeter-greeters' in order to present a more complete picture of the number of people accessing/egressing an airport.

Airport user experience unpacked: Conceptualizing its potential in the face of COVID-19

“…While publications concerning the system's vulnerabilities and previous major events help illustrate how passengers and certain employees are affected, other airport users, are almost entirely missing, even in the wider literature, apart from perhaps meeter-greeters (e.g. Budd, 2016 ),. This illustrates a lack of understanding of important users.…”

An exploratory empirical analysis of willingness to hire and pay for flying taxis and shared flying car services

“…Earlier research has attempted to identify the consumers' perception patterns towards the acceptance of electric vehicles and possible benefits and infrastructure requirements (Egbue and Long, 2012;Tamor et al, 2013;Dong et al, 2014;Shin et al, 2015;Rezvani et al, 2018). Carsharing schemes provide flexible and accessible mobility patterns and have significant potential in alleviating urban traffic congestion (Shaheen et al, 2006;Habib et al, 2012;Budd, 2016). In the last decade, automotive industry has been leaning towards the introduction of autonomous vehicles, which, in turn, led to an abundance of studies exploring public perceptions, opinions and possible transformations of travel behavior (Rödel et al, 2014;Choi and Ji, 2015;Kyriakidis et al, 2015;Bansal et al, 2016;Ellis et al, 2016;Nordhoff et al, 2016;Fu and Kim, 2016;Becker and Axhausen, 2017;Xu et al, 2018).…”

Integrated Door-to-Door Transport Services for Air Passengers: From Intermodality to Multimodality

“…The access time and cost are directly proportional to the airport access distance for almost all access modes and systems across many European and US airports [45]. Among all options (e.g., car, taxi and public transport), car transport usually has the largest share due to the greater comfort, convenience, personal security and reliability perceived by passengers [49]. Thus, to become attractive alternatives, taxi and public transport options should meet passengers' needs and preferences by understanding the main factors that influence their choices.…”