An exploratory study investigating the impact of the procedures used to manage patient substance misuse on nurse–patient relationships in a medium secure forensic unit

Abstract

The role conflict experienced by forensic psychiatric nurses between their therapeutic responsibilities and their responsibility to operationalize security procedures is well established in the literature. There has been less investigation into how this role conflict is played out specifically in the management of inpatient substance misuse in forensic units. This study, therefore, aimed to explore the views of nurses working in one medium secure unit of the impact of the procedures used to manage substance misuse (partial strip searching, room searching, canine searching, 'pat' (or 'rubdown') searching, urine drug screening) on their relationships with patients. Ten interviews of registered mental health nurses working in a medium secure unit in the Northwest were carried out. The interview data were transcribed verbatim and framework analysis used to identify emergent themes. The impact of the procedures on nurse-patient relationships was reported as largely negative by the participants. They reported that the intrusion of the procedures had a detrimental effect on their relationships with patients. The relative degree of intrusion posed by each of the procedures was an important factor in determining the extent and duration of damage to nurse-patient relationships, as was the communication skills of the nurse conducting the procedure.

Feasibility of training nurses in motivational interviewing to improve patient experience in mental health inpatient rehabilitation: a pilot study

“…Nurse–patient relationships may be negatively affected by stigmatizing attitudes amongst nurses (Ross & Goldner ), patients' difficulties with social behaviour (Pinkham & Penn ), nurses' beliefs that patients can control problem behaviours (Berry et al . ) and intrusive nursing practices (Price & Wibberley ). Studies in acute inpatient wards have found that patients spend relatively little time in contact with nurses and much in isolation (Sharac et al .…”

Introduction of a drug‐detection dog programme in mental health inpatient units: A mixed‐methods study of consumer, staff, and carers' perceptions

“…). Price and Wibberley () found that mental health nurses considered the use of DDD to be one of the least‐invasive search procedures, believing it to have less impact on the therapeutic relationship than urine drug screening or body or room searches, particularly when the programme is run by contractors external to the service, thereby distancing it from staff (Price & Wibberley ). In line with this, in our study, the overall level of agreement that the use of DDD impacts negatively on the therapeutic relationship with staff was quite low, and participants in our study gave greater credence to the use of DDD creating a safer ward environment and assisting the consumer‐recovery process.…”

Advocating for Pregnant Women in Prison

“…The FMHN needs to address substance use by FSPs to reduce risk to health and minimize reoffending Price & Wibberley, 2012). The FMHN needs to address substance use by FSPs to reduce risk to health and minimize reoffending Price & Wibberley, 2012).…”