1993
DOI: 10.1177/073724779301800404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Exploratory Study of Dynamic Assessment Involving Two Instructional Strategies On Experts and Novices' Performance in Solving Part-Whole Mathematical Word Problems

Abstract: The study assessed the differential effects of a specific and general strategy on experts and novices' transfer and maintenance performance of Part-Whole addition and subtraction word problems utilizing dynamic assessment. Dynamic assessment indicated important differences between experts and novices across and within the two instructional groups (specific and general) on transfer and maintenance performance when a criterion level of performance (75% correct) on the training task (one-step Part-Whole word prob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These word problems correspond to five different mathematical word problem types in other SBI literature that uses a specific schema for a specific type of mathematical word problem. These schemata are known as Change Schema, Group Schema, Compare Schema, Vary Schema, Equal-Group Schema, and Part–Whole Schema (Jitendra, DiPipi, & Perron-Jones, 2002; Jitendra, Griffin, Deatline-Buchman, & Sczesniak, 2007; Jitendra & Kameenui, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These word problems correspond to five different mathematical word problem types in other SBI literature that uses a specific schema for a specific type of mathematical word problem. These schemata are known as Change Schema, Group Schema, Compare Schema, Vary Schema, Equal-Group Schema, and Part–Whole Schema (Jitendra, DiPipi, & Perron-Jones, 2002; Jitendra, Griffin, Deatline-Buchman, & Sczesniak, 2007; Jitendra & Kameenui, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%