An Exploratory Study of Learning Behaviors and Their Relationship to Gains in Linguistic and Communicative Competence

Abstract

A questionnaire relating to presumed good learning behaviors was administered to 37 students enrolled in an eight‐week intensive course in English as a second language in preparation for graduate study in the United States. The answers to the self‐report questionnaire were classified according to the students' cultural background (Asian versus Hispanic) and field of specialization (professional engineering/science versus social science/humanities) and related to gains on four English language proficiency measures: linguistic competence; auditory comprehension; overall oral proficiency; and communicative competence, conceptualized here primarily as the ability to convey information. Analyses indicated that while the Asian subjects engaged in fewer of the assumed “good” learning behaviors than the Hispanics, they tended to make greater gains in linguistic competence and communicative competence. On the other hand, the Hispanic students made more progress in overall oral proficiency and in auditory comprehension. Examination of the relationships between specific behaviors and second language learning gains revealed an interesting split: Some behaviors were associated with conscious learning, while others were related to acquisition and gains in general communicative competence. Results indicate that caution in prescribing good learning behaviors is warranted. Considerable further research is needed to explain which behaviors are helpful for learners at various levels and to relate these behaviors to current second language learning theories.

The Relationship between Language Learning Strategies, Language Learning Beliefs, Motivation, and Proficiency: A Study of EFL Learners in Iran

“…Some studies have indicated that Asian students showed reluctance to try new learning techniques and did not respond well to strategy training. Such differences led Politzer and McGroarty (1985) to conclude that many accepted "good" language-learning strategies may be based on ethnocentric assumptions, namely Western, about effective language learning. Further, when compared to learners in other cultural settings it is apparent that the combination of strategies preferred by the Iranian students is not the same as other learners.…”

The Relationship between Iranian English Language Learners’ Learning Styles and Strategies

“…Politzer and McGroaty (1985) used a somewhat similar Behaviour Questionnaire containing 66 items divided into three groups: individual study behaviours, classroom behaviours, and interactions outside of class. However, reliability was marginally acceptable (.51, .61, and .63) for their scale.…”

Communication Strategy Use and Proficiency Level of ESL Learners

“…152-153). For example, Politzer's (1983) items did not focus on "actual strategy use in a real learning task" and his subsequent study did not use a "unified psychological construct" (Politzer & McGroarty, 1985). Similarly, Huang and Van Naerssen (1987) included "learning strategies unrelated to oral communication" but Cohen, Weaver, and Li (1998) excluded "interactional aspects of communication".…”