2022
DOI: 10.46542/pe.2022.222.225229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exploratory study of pharmacists' views on the development of a professional recognition system in Indonesia

Abstract: Background: A professional recognition system is defined as a quality assured process that recognises an individual's achievement of the completion of knowledge and skills in a particular area or stage of practice. There is an increased interest in professional recognition system development worldwide. Objective: This study aims to explore perceptions from practising pharmacists regarding their interests, perceived benefits and methods of the professional recognition system. Methods: Forty-three pharmacists … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, financial incentives adequacy is essential and may improve professional practice when providing CPS 52. While it is true that providing clinical and non-clinical services is part of the standard services by the pharmacist,53 with an immature professional recognition system,54 augmented by variability in the remunerated service, patient eligibility and fees, making standardised financial incentives difficult, despite growing financial support 55. The inadequacy is stressed by our finding, where perceived financial incentives still lag, even with presumably supportive policies, infrastructure, quality care and self-competence of the pharmacist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, financial incentives adequacy is essential and may improve professional practice when providing CPS 52. While it is true that providing clinical and non-clinical services is part of the standard services by the pharmacist,53 with an immature professional recognition system,54 augmented by variability in the remunerated service, patient eligibility and fees, making standardised financial incentives difficult, despite growing financial support 55. The inadequacy is stressed by our finding, where perceived financial incentives still lag, even with presumably supportive policies, infrastructure, quality care and self-competence of the pharmacist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%