2007
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extended dead‐end elimination algorithm to determine gap‐free lists of low energy states

Abstract: Abstract:Proteins are flexible systems and commonly populate several functionally important states. To understand protein function, these states and their energies have to be identified. We introduce an algorithm that allows the determination of a gap-free list of the low energy states. This algorithm is based on the dead-end elimination (DEE) theorem and is termed X-DEE (extended DEE). X-DEE is applicable to discrete systems whose state energy can be formulated as pairwise interaction between sites and their … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, we conclude that for the larger protein design problems, the DEE‐based methods presented in Ref 31. and32 are not applicable, since even finding the single lowest energy rotamer assignment for these problems using the sophisticated DEE criteria28, 29 of the HERO algorithm was not possible within a more than reasonable amount of time. We also emphasize that, since we actually wish to obtain the top 100 sequences, a non‐zero DEE threshold would still be required for these problems, which would leave the rotamer space resulting from the application of DEE even larger than that listed in Table I (“DEE” column), that is, making A* even less likely to be feasible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, we conclude that for the larger protein design problems, the DEE‐based methods presented in Ref 31. and32 are not applicable, since even finding the single lowest energy rotamer assignment for these problems using the sophisticated DEE criteria28, 29 of the HERO algorithm was not possible within a more than reasonable amount of time. We also emphasize that, since we actually wish to obtain the top 100 sequences, a non‐zero DEE threshold would still be required for these problems, which would leave the rotamer space resulting from the application of DEE even larger than that listed in Table I (“DEE” column), that is, making A* even less likely to be feasible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A more recently devised method for providing successive low‐energy assignments is that of X‐DEE,32 which successively applies DEE to disjoint subspaces until a specified number of lowest energy rotamer assignments are found. However, X‐DEE requires very many runs of DEE on large subspaces, and for cases where the search space is very large as for protein design (unlike the case of two‐state variables tested in Ref 32…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this occurs, the combined process is heuristic and the provable guarantee is lost. Other modifications to DEE include X-DEE (extended DEE), which gives gap-free lists of low-energy states for a given energy range and was applied to the determination of protonation states of a protein [26], and type-variant DEE, which can be used in multistate protein design [27]. Further descriptions of DEE modifications and successes can be found in Fung et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where P m (t) denotes the probability that the system is in charge state m at time t, k ml denotes the probability per unit time that the system will change its state from l to m. The summation runs over all possible states l. In order to restrict the number of states and only consider states that are accessible in a certain energy range, methods like extended Dead End Elimination (Kloppmann et al 2007) can be used. Simulating charge transfer by Eq.…”
Section: Simulating Chemical Reactions Using a Master Equation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%