2009
DOI: 10.1002/nag.777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extended finite element framework for slow‐rate frictional faulting with bulk plasticity and variable friction

Abstract: SUMMARYWe present an extended finite element (FE) approach for the simulation of slow-rate frictional faulting in geologic media incorporating bulk plasticity and variable friction. The method allows the fault to pass through the interior of FEs without remeshing. The extended FE algorithm for frictional faulting, advocated in two recent articles, emanates from a variational equation formulated in terms of the relative displacement on the fault. In the present paper we consider the combined effects of bulk pla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They noted the superior rates of convergence for the penalty method compared to the LATIN method. The approach has been extended to problems with bulk plasticity (Khoei et al, 2006;Liu and Borja, 2009) and large sliding contact (Khoei and Mousavi, 2010;Liu and Borja, 2010a). It should be noted that these approaches still represent a regularization of a discrete formulation that is unstable, and involve a free penalty parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They noted the superior rates of convergence for the penalty method compared to the LATIN method. The approach has been extended to problems with bulk plasticity (Khoei et al, 2006;Liu and Borja, 2009) and large sliding contact (Khoei and Mousavi, 2010;Liu and Borja, 2010a). It should be noted that these approaches still represent a regularization of a discrete formulation that is unstable, and involve a free penalty parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the Galerkin finite element approach used in the current study may be replaced by any other domain-based model. For example, if we want to relax the constraint that the fault location is known apriori, a more flexible approach would be to adopt a discretization approach that readily accounts for discontinuities such as generalized finite element method (F. Liu & Borja, 2009), or discontinuous Galerkin methods (Pelties et al, 2012), or phase field model (Miehe et al, 2010), which would further enable arbitrary growth of fault surfaces, as well as nucleation and growth of new surfaces. Furthermore, the FEM may be replaced by a discrete element method (Herrmann et al, 1998) or smooth particle hydrodynamics formulation (Bui et al, 2008) to enable explicit incorporation of fault gouge dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new fault whose geometry is not a priori known is an important topic to study. One advantage of the proposed hybrid approach is that it can easily adopt volume based discretization techniques with embedded discontinuities such as XFEM() or explicit discontinuities such as Discontinuous Galerkin . These methods may replace the continuous Galerkin domain‐based method used in this current work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%