“…e first data set is: "1.7, 2.5, 27.4, 1.0, 27.1, 2.2, 22.9, 1.7, 0.1, 1.1, 14.4, 1.1, 0.4, 20.6, 5.3, 0.7, 1.9, 13.0, 12.0, 9.3, 1.4, 18.7, 8.5, 25.5, 11.6, 21.5, 27.6, 36.4, 2.7, 14.1, 22.1, 1.1, 2.5, 14.4, 1.7, 37.6, 0.6, 2.2, 39.0, 0.3, 15.0, 11.0, 7.3, 0.6, 9.0, 1.7, 7.0, 20.1, 0.4, 2.8, 14.1, 9.9, 10.4, 10.7, 30.0, 3.6, 5.6, 30.8, 13.3, 4.2, 25.5, 3.4, 11.9, 64.0, 1.5, 20.2, 16.8, 5.3, 9.7, 27.5, 2.5 and 7.0." e fit of the proposed model are compared with the transmuted Gompertz-Makeham (TGM) (Abd El-Bar [29]), beta generalized Gompertz (BGG) (Benkhelifa [30]), kumaraswamy gompertz makeham (KGM) (Chukwu and Ogunde [5]), Gompertz Lomax (GL) (Oguntunde et al [31]), exponentiated generalized Weibull-Gompertz (EGWG) (El-Bassiouny et al [32]), generalized Gompertz (GG) (El-Gohary et al [33]) and Gompertz models.…”