2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jms.2010.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extended Lennard-Jones potential energy function for diatomic molecules: Application to ground electronic states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of high-level theoretical calculations, there are a large number of papers and reviews dealing exclusively or predominately with these molecules, in the literature. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] The lithium dimer (Li 2 ) is the second smallest stable homonuclear dimer next to H 2 . Spectra of Li 2 were observed and analysed in the 1930s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of high-level theoretical calculations, there are a large number of papers and reviews dealing exclusively or predominately with these molecules, in the literature. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] The lithium dimer (Li 2 ) is the second smallest stable homonuclear dimer next to H 2 . Spectra of Li 2 were observed and analysed in the 1930s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular interaction field (MIF) calculations were performed by placing each probe at different GRID steps iteratively. Furthermore, total interaction energy ( E xyz ) as a sum of Lennard–Jones potential energy ( E lj ), electrostatic ( E el ) potential interactions, and hydrogen-bond ( E hb ) interactions was calculated at each grid point as shown in Equation (6) [ 134 , 135 ]: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transformation to the canonical form and its associated piecewise affine transformation between two different potential curves exploited in ref are distinctly different from the traditional process of constructing approximations to potential curves within a specified family of functions depending upon a finite number of free parameters . In the present work, it is shown how the two points of view can be perceived in stark contrast by applying the above transformation to the canonical form to three of the simplest classical algebraic potential forms, the Kratzer potential, , the Morse potential, , and both a classic , and a generalized Lennard-Jones potential, defined as follows. In the following definitions, D e = E ( R e ) denotes the well depth (dissociation energy for a diatomic molecule) for the potential, R e denotes the equilibrium separation distance of the nuclei for a diatomic molecule, and R am denotes the separation distance of the nuclei at which the attractive (Feynman) force has maximum magnitude, that is, the inflection point of E ( R ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Furthermore, there is the potential for reducing computational costs associated with their application in molecular calculations for increasingly complex calculations in fields such as biochemistry and nanotechnology to name a few. [13][14][15][16][17] Three specific algebraic forms for representing pairwise interactions that were among the first introduced and have had a venerated history are the Lennard-Jones 18,19 which can be regarded as a special case of the Mie potential, 20 Kratzer 21,22 and Morse 23,24 potentials. These three potentials have continued popularity for widespread applications, primarily because of limited numbers of adjustable parameters and their abilities to account for the most important inherent characteristics of the potentials they are chosen to represent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%