2019
DOI: 10.1002/sim.8362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extended mixed‐effects framework for meta‐analysis

Abstract: Standard methods for meta‐analysis are limited to pooling tasks in which a single effect size is estimated from a set of independent studies. However, this setting can be too restrictive for modern meta‐analytical applications. In this contribution, we illustrate a general framework for meta‐analysis based on linear mixed‐effects models, where potentially complex patterns of effect sizes are modeled through an extended and flexible structure of fixed and random terms. This definition includes, as special cases… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
159
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(215 reference statements)
1
159
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second stage, we used a new multilevel meta-analytical approach to summarise the city specific associations 16. Briefly, this model defines more complex random effects structures that account for the hierarchical structure of the data—namely, cities nested within countries, and provides the best linear unbiased predictors for the associations between NO 2 and mortality at both levels 16. We computed the global, country, and city specific estimates and 95% confidence intervals as percentage change in daily mortality per 10 μg/m 3 increase of NO 2 concentrations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second stage, we used a new multilevel meta-analytical approach to summarise the city specific associations 16. Briefly, this model defines more complex random effects structures that account for the hierarchical structure of the data—namely, cities nested within countries, and provides the best linear unbiased predictors for the associations between NO 2 and mortality at both levels 16. We computed the global, country, and city specific estimates and 95% confidence intervals as percentage change in daily mortality per 10 μg/m 3 increase of NO 2 concentrations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general statistical framework applied here is an extension of the classic two stage design6 and incorporates complex multivariable associations, hierarchical pooling methods, and the computation of impact measures 181920. Briefly, we first estimated city specific ozone-mortality risks from separate time series regression models and then pooled these through a meta-analysis in the second stage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second stage we pooled city specific estimates through a multilevel meta-analysis. This novel meta-analytical model defines more complex random effects that can account for variations in risk across two nested grouping levels, represented by cities within countries 19. This approach allowed the derivation of improved estimates of ozone-mortality associations at both city and country level, defined as best linear unbiased predictions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The province-specific coefficients of the function defining the excess risk were then pooled in the second stage using a mixed-effects multivariate meta-analysis, 18 and best linear unbiased predictions for each of the 107 provinces were extracted. This approach allows borrowing strengths in the estimates across provinces, while at the same time modelling flexible associations of multi-parameter functions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%