1985
DOI: 10.1137/0214069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Extension of Liouville’s Theorem on Integration in Finite Terms

Abstract: Abstract. In Part of this paper, we give an extension of Liouville's Theorem and give a number of examples which show that integration with special functions involves some phenomena that do not occur in integration with the elementary functions alone. Our main result generalizes Liouville's Theorem by allowing, in addition to the elementary functions, special functions such as the error function, Fresnel integrals and the logarithmic integral (but not the dilogorithm or exponential integral) to appear in the i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If E is an elementary extension of C(x), the result follows from Risch (1968). If E is a purely transcendental liouvillian extension of C(x), the result follows from Theorem Al(b) of Singer et al (1985) and the fact that we can effectively embed such an extension in a log-explicit extension. We now assume that t'/t e E and let t'/t= v.…”
Section: Ii) Ire Is a Purely Transcendental Liouvillian Extension Of mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If E is an elementary extension of C(x), the result follows from Risch (1968). If E is a purely transcendental liouvillian extension of C(x), the result follows from Theorem Al(b) of Singer et al (1985) and the fact that we can effectively embed such an extension in a log-explicit extension. We now assume that t'/t e E and let t'/t= v.…”
Section: Ii) Ire Is a Purely Transcendental Liouvillian Extension Of mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…(ii) Either ~ v is in E or it is transcendental over E. Lemma 3.4 of Rothstein & Caviness (1979) and Theorem A1 of Singer et al (1985) imply that one can effectively embed E(t) into a regular (i.e. purely transcendental) log-explicit extension F of C. Furthermore F will be of the form E (t~,..., t,), with the t~ in E. The corollary to Theorem I of Rosenlicht (1976) implies that t is transcendental over F. Given u in E it is enough to decide if y'+ uy = 0 has a solution in F(t), since the corollary to Theorem 1 of Rosenlicht (1976) will imply this solution lies in E. Therefore, let us assume that E is a regular tog-explicit extension of C. Theorem Al(b) now allows us to decide if y'+ uy = 0 has a solution in E(t) and find such a solution if it does.…”
Section: ) N ~ E~(t) E(t) Is a Computable Field So To Determine Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For an extensive list of literature and generalizations/refinements, like e.g. [50], we refer to [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer the reader to [3] for the standard definitions, and we let I be some class of functions (elementary, Liouvillian, EL [14] etc.). When we say "given an I function", we mean that it is given effectively, i.e.…”
Section: Integration In Elementary Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%