1996
DOI: 10.1080/00207169608804479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extension of the criteria for generalized diagonally dominant matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we give examples to shows that new criteria is more useful than that proposed [2,3]. …”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this section, we give examples to shows that new criteria is more useful than that proposed [2,3]. …”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 95%
“…An H -matrix (usually A ∈ C n,n ) is closely related to an M-matrix and many convergence properties of an M-matrix carry over, almost directly, to convergence properties for an H -matrix. This explains the fact that in the last decade so many works ( [2][3][4][5]7,9,11,12]) have appeared to propose various criteria (algorithms) that decide whether the matrix A of the linear system to be solved is an H -matrix. The majority of the criteria to make this decision are iterative in nature and assume, without explicitly stating it, that the matrix A in question is dense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In general this is not an easy task. In recent years, there are quite few studies on this subject, and several methods some of which are quite efficient have been proposed for determining if a given A is or isn't a GDDM and possibly a diagonal matrix D in case when it is GDDM (see, e.g., [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]). These methods can be divided into two categories: direct methods and iterative ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%