2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10711-016-0176-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An extension of the LMO functor

Abstract: Abstract. Cheptea, Habiro and Massuyeau constructed the LMO functor, which is defined on a certain category of cobordisms between two surfaces with at most one boundary component. In this paper, we extend the LMO functor to the case of any number of boundary components, and our functor reflects relations among the parts corresponding to the genera and boundary components of surfaces. We also discuss a relationship with finite-type invariants and Milnor invariants.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AA is a linear symmetric monoidal category extending both " A and the linear version of A mentioned in Remark 3.5, and, similarly, ts AA extends both ts A and this linear version of A. We remark that the extension of Z to LCobT q also generalizes Nozaki's extension of the LMO functor to Lagrangian cobordisms of punctured surfaces [50].…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…AA is a linear symmetric monoidal category extending both " A and the linear version of A mentioned in Remark 3.5, and, similarly, ts AA extends both ts A and this linear version of A. We remark that the extension of Z to LCobT q also generalizes Nozaki's extension of the LMO functor to Lagrangian cobordisms of punctured surfaces [50].…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The former are contained in the "tree reduction" of the LMO functor [5], while the latter are contained in the "tree reduction" of the Kontsevich integral [8]. It seems possible to describe diagrammatically the generalized Johnson homomorphisms τ i m for any g, p ≥ 0 and to relate them to the "tree reduction" of the extended LMO functor introduced in [27]. Example 10.13.…”
Section: Two Types Of Series Associated With Pairs Of Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%