1973
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1973.10481458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Extension of the T-Method of Multiple Comparison to Include the Cases with Unequal Sample Sizes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
101
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spjotvoll-Stoline post hoc tests 27 were performed to test the statistical significance of the differences among the mean scores of two or more groups. Blood pressure variables were adjusted for BMI, WHR, insulin and cortisol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spjotvoll-Stoline post hoc tests 27 were performed to test the statistical significance of the differences among the mean scores of two or more groups. Blood pressure variables were adjusted for BMI, WHR, insulin and cortisol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RLC parameters of day 26 were used for this as it was felt that the phytoplankton bloom might have interfered with the photosynthesis data collected on day 32. Differences in RLC parameters between HL plants and plants from the field sites were tested for significance using a one-way ANOVA, followed by a Tukey honest significant difference test for unequal sample sizes (Spjøtvoll and Stoline, 1973). Data were tested for heteroscedasticity with Bartlett's test for homogeneity (Sokal and Rohlf, 1995).…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For statistical analyses, sternal and mid-dorsal blubber thicknesses of KBS, ESB, and EDN carcasses of immature seals were compared using a one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's pairwise comparisons and a family-error rate of 0.05 (Spjotvoll and Stoline, 1973). Standard lengths and axillary girths of ESB and EDN carcasses were compared using a two-sample t-test at a 0.05 level of significance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%