2020
DOI: 10.1145/3386295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Extensive Study on Cross-Dataset Bias and Evaluation Metrics Interpretation for Machine Learning Applied to Gastrointestinal Tract Abnormality Classification

Abstract: Precise and efficient automated identification of gastrointestinal (GI) tract diseases can help doctors treat more patients and improve the rate of disease detection and identification. Currently, automatic analysis of diseases in the GI tract is a hot topic in both computer science and medical-related journals. Nevertheless, the evaluation of such an automatic analysis is often incomplete or simply wrong. Algorithms are often only tested on small and biased datasets, and cross-dataset evaluations are rarely p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We trained two CNN-based classifiers to classify the labelled data. Both architectures have previously shown excellent performance on classifying GI-related imagery from traditional colonoscopies 50 , 51 , and should be a good benchmark for VCE-related data. The two algorithms are based on standard CNN architectures, namely DenseNet-161 52 and ResNet-152 53 .…”
Section: Technical Validationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We trained two CNN-based classifiers to classify the labelled data. Both architectures have previously shown excellent performance on classifying GI-related imagery from traditional colonoscopies 50 , 51 , and should be a good benchmark for VCE-related data. The two algorithms are based on standard CNN architectures, namely DenseNet-161 52 and ResNet-152 53 .…”
Section: Technical Validationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The problem statement is to estimate whether the patient has cancerous disease or not, with the help of a supervised machine learning algorithm [14]. Supervised machine learning algorithms such as logistic regression, naive Bayes, decision tree have used in this research to predict the cancer disease in patients [3]. A significant number of people in the world suffers from undiagnosed or misdiagnosed cancer diseases.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No fine-tuning was used for this method. • Averaged ResNet-152 + DenseNet-161 38,61 is an approach that combines the ResNet-152 and DenseNet-161 approach by averaging the output of both models as the final prediction. Both models were trained simultaneously by backpropagating the averaged loss through both models.…”
Section: Technical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the ResNet-152 and DenseNet-161 models were initialized using the best weights of the above Pre-Trained ResNet-152 and Pre-Trained DenseNet-161 implementations. • ResNet-152 + DenseNet-161 + MLP 38,61 is similar to the previous method using both ResNet-152 and DenseNet-161 to generate a prediction. However, instead of averaging the output of each model, this method uses a simple multilayer perceptron (MLP) to estimate the best way to average the output of each model.…”
Section: Technical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation