2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2005.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exterior and interior leaded dust deposition survey in New York City: Results of a 2-year study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It Table 6 Summary of information on a number of available sampling devices for household surface lead loading rates Condition Gulson et al 1995Trepka et al 1997, Caravanos et al 2006Hogervorst et al 2007Spalinger et al 2007 Current study (Australia) Meyer et al 1999a, b had sufficient low-end sensitivity to detect surface lead loading rates in low contamination settings, could distinguish well between high lead and low lead contamination households, manifest little variation between two locations within the same room, and appeared to be an acceptable proxy for lead loading rate at floor level. In addition, the small size of each deposition plate and the lightness of the plastic protective trays rendered the method convenient for the field investigator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It Table 6 Summary of information on a number of available sampling devices for household surface lead loading rates Condition Gulson et al 1995Trepka et al 1997, Caravanos et al 2006Hogervorst et al 2007Spalinger et al 2007 Current study (Australia) Meyer et al 1999a, b had sufficient low-end sensitivity to detect surface lead loading rates in low contamination settings, could distinguish well between high lead and low lead contamination households, manifest little variation between two locations within the same room, and appeared to be an acceptable proxy for lead loading rate at floor level. In addition, the small size of each deposition plate and the lightness of the plastic protective trays rendered the method convenient for the field investigator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The method in this study was adapted from that of Caravanos (Caravanos et al 2006), in which a large glass sheet of area 9 ft 2 (8,361 cm 2 ) was placed in position and the accumulated lead in settled dust determined after varying periods. A similar principle was used in the current study, but modifying the method by using smaller dust deposition plates and a fixed duration of placement.…”
Section: Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Floor entrance (Tong and Lam, 2000) Season (Laxen et al, 1988), (Yiin et al, 2000), (Laidlaw et al, 2005), (Laidlaw and Filippelli, 2008), (Mielke et al, 2010), (Clark et al, 2011), (Dixon et al, 2012) Wet cleaning landing floor (Gaitens et al, 2009) Type of room (Wilson et al, 2007) Wet cleaning freq-room (Yiin et al, 2003), (Bretin, 2006), (Gaitens et al, 2009) Dry cleaning freq-room Dust sample location (U.S. HUD, 2003), (Bretin, 2006), (Wilson et al, 2007) Number of activities at risk (Sanborn et al, 2002), (Schapiro and Bretin, 2006) XRF ext railings (Gibson, 2005) Ext playground soil (Fergusson et al, 1986), (Thornton et al, 1990), (Succop et al, 1998), (Clark et al, 2004), (Dixon et al, 2005b), (Caravanos et al, 2006), (Dixon et al, 2008), (Hunt et al, 2006), (Hunt et al, 2012) Ext playground dust…”
Section: Covariate Label Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method for collecting specimens for determination of SLLR was modified from a study conducted in an urban setting in the United States 10) and previously tested in a boatyard community setting 6) . Two glass plates with a deleaded surface for lead deposition, each 20 × 30 cm, were suspended at a position approximately 50 cm from the ceiling in each house.…”
Section: Specimen Collection For Determination Of Surface Lead Loadinmentioning
confidence: 99%