2020
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab6d78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Extreme X-Ray Variability Event of a Weak-line Quasar

Abstract: We report the discovery of an extreme X-ray flux rise (by a factor of 20) of the weak-line quasar SDSS J153913.47+395423.4 (hereafter SDSS J1539+3954) at z = 1.935. SDSS J1539+3954 is the most-luminous object among radio-quiet type 1 AGNs where such dramatic X-ray variability has been observed. Before the X-ray flux rise, SDSS J1539+3954 appeared X-ray weak compared with the expectation from its UV flux; after the rise, the ratio of its X-ray flux and UV flux is consistent with the majority of the AGN populati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we limit our sample to the 50 most luminous quasars in sample A, which have 31.3 log(L 2500 Å) 32.0 and a median log(L 2500 Å) value of 31.4, the X-ray weak fraction becomes 15 ± 6%. Such a luminosity dependence for the fraction of X-ray weak quasars is in general agreement with our interpretations of X-ray weak quasars as WLQs (e.g., Luo et al 2015;Ni et al 2018; Section 5.2.1) or due to extreme X-ray variability (e.g., Liu et al 2019;Ni et al 2020;Section 5.2.3), where quasars accreting at high Eddington ratios may have X-ray absorption from a geometrically thick inner accretion disk or its associated outflow; the fraction of such quasars is likely higher among more luminous samples. The relevance of the enhanced fraction of X-ray weak quasars to WLQs is also noted in both Nardini et al (2019) and Zappacosta et al (2020).…”
Section: Fractions Of X-ray Weak Quasars Among Two Subsamplessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…If we limit our sample to the 50 most luminous quasars in sample A, which have 31.3 log(L 2500 Å) 32.0 and a median log(L 2500 Å) value of 31.4, the X-ray weak fraction becomes 15 ± 6%. Such a luminosity dependence for the fraction of X-ray weak quasars is in general agreement with our interpretations of X-ray weak quasars as WLQs (e.g., Luo et al 2015;Ni et al 2018; Section 5.2.1) or due to extreme X-ray variability (e.g., Liu et al 2019;Ni et al 2020;Section 5.2.3), where quasars accreting at high Eddington ratios may have X-ray absorption from a geometrically thick inner accretion disk or its associated outflow; the fraction of such quasars is likely higher among more luminous samples. The relevance of the enhanced fraction of X-ray weak quasars to WLQs is also noted in both Nardini et al (2019) and Zappacosta et al (2020).…”
Section: Fractions Of X-ray Weak Quasars Among Two Subsamplessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, such a scenario is difficult to reconcile with the observations of Xray weak state in several highly accreting narrow line Seyfert 1s (NSy1s) and quasars, where the UV flux remains almost constant despite the huge X-ray drop (Gallo et al 2011;Miniutti et al 2012;Grupe et al 2019). Since sources with high Eddington ratios such as NSy1s are expected to have a geometrically thick accretion disk in innermost region, the disk self-shielding can explain the extreme X-ray variability while UV/optical continuum at larger radii is not affected, similar to the explanation proposed for the X-ray behavior of weak-line quasars (Luo et al 2015;Ni et al 2018). Another scenario that has been invoked to account for the X-ray weakness is that the direct nuclear emis-sion is suppressed by the light-bending effect near the SMBH (Miniutti et al 2003;Miniutti & Fabian 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Alternatively, several works have invoked a partial covering model to account for extreme X-ray variability behaviors of AGNs, especially those high accreting systems (Luo et al 2015;Liu et al 2019;Ni et al 2020). In this model, the central X-ray source could be partially obscured by a thick inner disk or outflow if it intercepts the line of sight.…”
Section: Possible Origins For the X-ray Brighteningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this hypothesis can be tested only by analysing additional, deeper X-ray observations (preferably including data at > 10 keV) to reveal typical relativistic reflection spectral features. Similary, lightbending effects have also been invoked by Ni et al (2020) as a viable explanation to justify the extreme X-ray variability of the z = 1.935, WLQ SDSS J153913.47+395423.4. This source was found to be in an X-ray weak state, before its flux raised by a factor of ∼ 20, approximately six years after its first observation (corresponding to ∼ 2 years in the QSO rest frame).…”
Section: Properties Of the X-ray Continuum And X-ray Weaknessmentioning
confidence: 68%