2020
DOI: 10.20944/preprints202005.0363.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Eye on the Dog as the Scientist’s Best Friend for Translational Research in Ophthalmology: Focus on the Ocular Surface

Abstract: Preclinical animal studies provide valuable opportunities to better understand human diseases and contribute to major advances in medicine. This review provides a comprehensive overview of ocular parameters in humans and selected animals, with a focus on the ocular surface, detailing species differences in ocular surface anatomy, physiology, tear film dynamics and tear film composition. We describe major pitfalls that tremendously limit the translational potential of traditional laboratory animals (ie., rabbit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 209 publications
(436 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 However, tear drainage (assessed with TTR) did not differ significantly in dogs with or without experimentally induced conjunctivitis (present study), nor did it change in a recent report of dogs receiving artificial tears at a volume of 10-100 µL. 27 Discrepancies between rabbits and dogs are likely due to notable differences in blinking rates (0.05-0.19 blinks/min vs 14.2 blinks/min, respectively), 29 an important physiologic response that promotes spillage of excessive tearing onto the periocular skin. 27,29 The quality of tears, or tear film stability, was reduced in canine eyes with a model of acute conjunctivitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…6 However, tear drainage (assessed with TTR) did not differ significantly in dogs with or without experimentally induced conjunctivitis (present study), nor did it change in a recent report of dogs receiving artificial tears at a volume of 10-100 µL. 27 Discrepancies between rabbits and dogs are likely due to notable differences in blinking rates (0.05-0.19 blinks/min vs 14.2 blinks/min, respectively), 29 an important physiologic response that promotes spillage of excessive tearing onto the periocular skin. 27,29 The quality of tears, or tear film stability, was reduced in canine eyes with a model of acute conjunctivitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…These results provide useful information for clinicians who manage canine patients with an acute injury to the ocular surface (eg, corneal ulcer, foreign body, or chemical burn with secondary conjunctivitis), and for basic scientists who utilize histamine-induced conjunctivitis as a model to investigate ocular pharmacology and therapeutics. 19,29 It is well established that corneal irritation causes reflex tearing across species, [30][31][32][33] with greater corneal nociceptive stimulation leading to greater tear production. 33 In contrast, little is known about the impact of conjunctival irritation on lacrimal secretion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Normality of data was assessed with the Shapiro–Wilk test. A mixed model for repeated measures was fitted to the data using the R software version 3.6.0, as previously described (Sebbag et al., 2019 ; Sebbag et al., 2020 ; Sebbag & Mochel, 2020 ). In the model, IOP was the response variable; the group (drug or control), time (0–250 min) and group‐by‐time interaction were treated as fixed effects; and the animal and animal‐by‐group interaction were treated as random effects, using animal as block.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%