2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An fMRI study of sex differences in brain activation during object naming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is proposed that the retrieval of information related to their use might aid in their recognition and naming [17,57] .…”
Section: Category-specific Naming For Man-made Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is proposed that the retrieval of information related to their use might aid in their recognition and naming [17,57] .…”
Section: Category-specific Naming For Man-made Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that functional neuroimaging measures only correlations between cerebral activity and behavior [17,39,57] , that is, an "activated" area may actually not be essential for completing a specifi c task. Therefore, it is impossible for us to know from our fMRI study whether the areas that we report do play a critical role in the recognition of that class.…”
Section: Category-specific Naming For Man-made Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, many studies have founded the functional dimorphisms in language (Shaywitz et al, 1995), emotion (Hofer et al, 2006), memory (Speck et al, 2000), object naming (Garn et al, 2009). There are also evidences for the gender-related structural differences in brain volume, brain tissue composition (Nopoulos et al, 2000;Sullivan et al, 2004) and the cortical morphometry (Good et al, 2001;Im et al, 2006;Luders et al, 2004;Raz et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it aims to expand on the findings of Allen et al [30] by including a larger sample of subjects with a balanced number of male and female subjects. Recent research shows potential sex differences detected by fMRI techniques when subjects perform a verbal task and it needs to be determined whether such differences exist between males and females in a SVT paradigm [39]. The second purpose of this study is to examine brain activation associated with intentional malingering on the WMT in normal populations, which is referred to here as simulated poor effort (SPE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%