“…For both products and raw materials, their efficacies were mainly assessed in terms of their ability to moisturize, produce anti-allergy and anti-inflammatory reactions, reduce erythema, and enhance or repair barrier function. The selection of biophysical parameters was also slightly different depending on the product, but according to the frequency of use, the following data were obtained: 89.47% were assessed with TEWL (n=17), 55 , 70–74 , 76–82 , 84–87 63.16% with SCH (n=12), 70–74 , 76 , 78 , 79 , 82–84 , 87 31.58% with the EI (n=6), 70 , 72 , 74 , 76 , 81 , 82 15.79% with the a* value (n=3), 72 , 82 , 87 10.53% with sebum content (n=2), 70 , 77 10.53% with skin temperature (n=2), 79 , 85 10.53% with pH (n=2), 76 , 79 10.53% with blood flow (n=2), 80 , 87 10.53% with VISIA (n=2), 72 , 75 5.26% with skin elasticity (n=1), 76 and 5.26% with the L* value (n=1). 72 …”