52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2013
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2013.6760428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An identification method for individual driver steering behaviour modelled by switched affine systems

Abstract: This paper adresses the issue of modelling and identification of individual driver steering behaviour from a new point of view, incorporating the idea of human motion being built up by an individual and limited repertoire of learned patterns. We introduce a switched affine model structure to explain a measurable motion alphabet in the driving context and show that this leads to a new identification problem that differs from general hybrid identification issues. To solve this problem, we derive a multi-step mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main challenge of the introduced identification problem is the mutual dependency of the parameter estimation quality and the correctly identified switching times. As in case of measurement noise the parameter estimationΘ λi of the ith interval improves with increasing estimation time as long as all measurement data belong to the same subsystem λ i (see [29] for detailed discussion), it is reasonable to push the end of the estimation interval k est as far as possible for each subsystem. On the other hand the estimation interval should not be larger than the true interval [τ i , τ i ] for the active subsystem λ i , because the usage of measured values of the next subsystem λ i+1 will lead to a deteriorating parameter estimation in general.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The main challenge of the introduced identification problem is the mutual dependency of the parameter estimation quality and the correctly identified switching times. As in case of measurement noise the parameter estimationΘ λi of the ith interval improves with increasing estimation time as long as all measurement data belong to the same subsystem λ i (see [29] for detailed discussion), it is reasonable to push the end of the estimation interval k est as far as possible for each subsystem. On the other hand the estimation interval should not be larger than the true interval [τ i , τ i ] for the active subsystem λ i , because the usage of measured values of the next subsystem λ i+1 will lead to a deteriorating parameter estimation in general.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [29] an extended procedure is introduced that is guaranteed to yield the true switching times and subsystem parameters respectively for given ground truth. As already mentioned, this requires the whole measurement data to be available.…”
Section: A Basic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Huge research on joysticks and related interfaces including haptic systems has emerged [ 3 7 ], and new control models [ 8 , 9 ] are continuing to develop. The available driver models however suffer lack of individuality [ 10 ], focusing mostly on the common user attributes, and assume that all users respond to particular navigational situations by similar general patterns. Such driver models employ general parameters that barely correspond to measurements obtained from extreme users and hardly take into consideration the contextual nature of human response to stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%