2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-020-09958-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An image super-resolution deep learning network based on multi-level feature extraction module

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, dense connection topological structure is to aggregate outputs of all dense unit to the end of dense block. In superresolution (SR) domain, deeper network helps to improve image reconstruction quality and introduce residual connection to avoid gradient disappearance, but deep network is computationally intensive and inefficient, Yang et al [ 59 ] used a new dense connection approach to extract low-resolution image features; model topology is to merge outputs of unit into the end of module and obtain deeper network and richer feature map by reducing the number of channels and network parameters; model was experimentally shown to be effective in SR with different magnifications. Mostefa et al [ 60 ] proposed DenseMultiOCM for extracting MRI image features in brain tumor segmentation, improved dense connection by connecting only unit output to final output of dense block, dense units in series to two 3 × 3 convolutions, and final unit used pooling and upsampling to extract half-scale features; experiments showed model segmentation results were improved.…”
Section: Development Of Densenetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, dense connection topological structure is to aggregate outputs of all dense unit to the end of dense block. In superresolution (SR) domain, deeper network helps to improve image reconstruction quality and introduce residual connection to avoid gradient disappearance, but deep network is computationally intensive and inefficient, Yang et al [ 59 ] used a new dense connection approach to extract low-resolution image features; model topology is to merge outputs of unit into the end of module and obtain deeper network and richer feature map by reducing the number of channels and network parameters; model was experimentally shown to be effective in SR with different magnifications. Mostefa et al [ 60 ] proposed DenseMultiOCM for extracting MRI image features in brain tumor segmentation, improved dense connection by connecting only unit output to final output of dense block, dense units in series to two 3 × 3 convolutions, and final unit used pooling and upsampling to extract half-scale features; experiments showed model segmentation results were improved.…”
Section: Development Of Densenetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the magnification factor ×S, f sub−conv5_×S () is the sub-pixel convolution with the convolution kernel size [5,5,3…”
Section: Skipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose that the LR image with noise is LR N and the noise feature of LR image is LR NK , then NES can be expressed as 5 (1)…”
Section: The Cbdnet For Noise Cancellationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, the mainstream of SISR research is the methods based on deep learning. It mainly includes SRCNN [13], SRGAN [14], STFGAN [15], LapSRN [16], SAN [17], RCAN [18], MAMSR [19][20][21], and so on, which has gradually achieved better subjective and objective performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%