2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An IMC-PID controller with Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm for MSBR core power control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is can effectively improve the algorithm's global search capability [9]. Zeng et al proposed a cloud genetic algorithm by using cloud generator to replace the traditional crossover and mutation operators in genetic algorithm, which has achieved good results in function optimization [10]. Kumari et al combining genetic algorithms with cloud models offers a cloud-based evolutionary algorithm that effectively solves the problem of genetic algorithms and easily facilitates local optimization and early convergence [11].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is can effectively improve the algorithm's global search capability [9]. Zeng et al proposed a cloud genetic algorithm by using cloud generator to replace the traditional crossover and mutation operators in genetic algorithm, which has achieved good results in function optimization [10]. Kumari et al combining genetic algorithms with cloud models offers a cloud-based evolutionary algorithm that effectively solves the problem of genetic algorithms and easily facilitates local optimization and early convergence [11].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let the size of the particle swarm be N, the fitness value of the particle X i in the tth iteration is f i , and the average fitness value of the particle is equations ( 8)∼ (10):…”
Section: Basic Particle Swarm Optimization (Cpso)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This choice does not have a specific rule but heavily depends on the expert knowledge of the designer. To solve this difficulty, optimization algorithms have been proposed, such as particle swarm optimization [23,24]. Compared with mathematical algorithms and other heuristic optimization techniques, PSO is simple, easy to implement, robust to control parameters, and has high computational efficiency.…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, the combination of PID and advanced control methods and PID parameter optimization are always the research hotspots in the field of control engineering. On the one hand, some nonlinear PID control strategies, such as fractional PID [16], [17], neural network PID [18], [19], neural fuzzy PID [20], [21], and particle swarm optimization PID [22], [23] have been proposed. On the other hand, it is particularly important to adjust the PID controller parameters appropriately, using methods such as the well-known Ziegler -Nichols (ZN) tuning rule [24], H 2 /H ∞ robust optimization design [25], internal model control (IMC) principle [26], and other parameter adjustment methods [27], [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%