2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An immersed interface solver for the 2-D unbounded Poisson equation and its application to potential flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immersed interface methods are well-suited for simulations involving moving and deforming geometry, including fluid-structure interaction problems that are often discretized with lower-order immersed boundary or penalization methods. There are also promising developments in extending the IIM to non-smooth geometries with thin features, cusps, and acute interior corners [25,24], which would further broaden the range of flows that can be simulated with the current method. The accuracy of surface pressure and shear distributions can be greatly increased through the use of multi-resolution adaptive grids [52], which allow computational elements to be concentrated around immersed surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Immersed interface methods are well-suited for simulations involving moving and deforming geometry, including fluid-structure interaction problems that are often discretized with lower-order immersed boundary or penalization methods. There are also promising developments in extending the IIM to non-smooth geometries with thin features, cusps, and acute interior corners [25,24], which would further broaden the range of flows that can be simulated with the current method. The accuracy of surface pressure and shear distributions can be greatly increased through the use of multi-resolution adaptive grids [52], which allow computational elements to be concentrated around immersed surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle such problems, a common approach is to prescribe the solution outside of the problem domain (typically to zero value), and then treat the irregular domain boundary as a jump discontinuity. In this case the jump discontinuity is no longer physically constrained, and the value of the jump in each derivative f (k) (x α ) must be calculated directly from the function f (x) by evaluating a one-sided finite difference stencil [22,25,26]. To illustrate this procedure, consider the same function f discussed above, now with f (x) = 0 for x > x α to model a domain boundary (Figure 1b).…”
Section: Specializing the Explicit Jump Iimmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that the IIM introduces a similar modification to the Poisson equation (Marichal et al. 2014) and the Sherman–Morrison–Woodbury decomposition can produce an expression for the discrete vortex sheet strength (Gillis et al. 2019) that is equivalent to the formula we obtain by using the Schur complement method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%