2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An immune algorithm with power redistribution for solving economic dispatch problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difficulties of this system for any optimization algorithm are the nonlinear and noncontinuous decision space and the power balance constraint with network transmission losses. From Table 5, it clearly shows that the proposed method obtains the best result with lowest FEs than other techniques except for IA_EDP [7] in the 15-generating-unit test systems. However, it should be noted that the exact power loss computed from the best solution found by IA_EDP [7] is actually 30.2825 instead of 30.0187 as reported in the corresponding literature, which shows that the total generated power of the schedule is much less than the total load demand plus its total line loss; obviously, the best solution reported in [7] is in fact infeasible.…”
Section: Case Studies and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main difficulties of this system for any optimization algorithm are the nonlinear and noncontinuous decision space and the power balance constraint with network transmission losses. From Table 5, it clearly shows that the proposed method obtains the best result with lowest FEs than other techniques except for IA_EDP [7] in the 15-generating-unit test systems. However, it should be noted that the exact power loss computed from the best solution found by IA_EDP [7] is actually 30.2825 instead of 30.0187 as reported in the corresponding literature, which shows that the total generated power of the schedule is much less than the total load demand plus its total line loss; obviously, the best solution reported in [7] is in fact infeasible.…”
Section: Case Studies and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In recent decades, a wide variety of metaheuristic optimization methods such as genetic algorithm (GA) [4,5], artificial immune system (AIS) [6,7], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], differential evolution (DE) [17][18][19], gravitational search algorithm (GSA) [20], Tabu Search (TS) [21,22], neural network (NN) [23,24], evolutionary programming (EP) [25], bacterial foraging algorithm (BFA) [26], biogeography-based optimization (BBO) [27], and other population-based optimization algorithms [28][29][30][31][32] have been applied with success in solving the ED problems and been able to obtain better solutions compared to using conventional optimization methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From numerical results, it is shown that the proposed AIS provides a more efficient solution than do particle swarm optimization and evolutionary programming in terms of minimum cost and computation time. Aragón et al [32] present an AIS-inspired algorithm, called IA EDP, which tries to solve an economic dispatch problem. It makes use of two versions of a redistribution power operator which tries to keep the solutions that it finds.…”
Section: Ais Applications In Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then realcoded GA was proposed for continuous multi-dimensional problem [7,8]. Modern heuristic algorithms such as Harmony search algorithm (HSA) [9], modified Differential evolution algorithm [10], Cuckoo search algorithm [11], Immune algorithm (IA) [12], Evolutionary programming [13] are tested and reported on various single and multi-area economic dispatch problems. Combined multi-area problem [14] with emission constraint was proposed using chaotic artificial bee colony (CABC) methodology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%