2008
DOI: 10.1117/12.779401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An implementation of a fast backprojection image formation algorithm for spotlight-mode SAR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In its absence, it is common to assume flat terrain. However, if the scene is not suitably flat, distortion effects and defocussing can results in loss of image resolution [10].…”
Section: A Sar Imaging Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In its absence, it is common to assume flat terrain. However, if the scene is not suitably flat, distortion effects and defocussing can results in loss of image resolution [10].…”
Section: A Sar Imaging Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PFA requires assumptions of constant terrain elevation and flat wavefronts (far-field scenario) which are not required in the (re/back)-projection algorithms. Using techniques from the tomography literature it has been shown that the (re/back)-projection algorithms can also be implemented in O N 2 log N operations without the approximations of the PFA [9], [10]. Also, more recently another approach has been shown to provide similar speedup with additional theoretical guarantees regarding the quality of the reconstruction [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We currently partition the image into rectangular strips for distribution, although we have tested several image partitioning strategies with little resulting performance difference. Furthermore, a fully optimized SAR image formation framework would likely utilize hierarchical backprojection algorithms that reduce the computational complexity from O(N 3 ) to O(N 2 log N ) by downsampling the phase history data corresponding to a certain image space region to the sampling rate required for that image space region [8], [9]. When implementing such approaches, it is important to balance the computation associated with the resampling operations with those associated with backprojection.…”
Section: A Backprojection Parallelizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, the complexity of back-projection method is O(N 3 ), where N × N gives the SAR image size. 2 To address this issue, methods have been developed 3 and some of which leverage multi-core systems to improve the computational efficiency. 4 Many of these algorithms use approximation and sacrifice image quality in trade for reduced processing time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%