2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2008.09.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An implicit fourth-order compact finite difference scheme for one-dimensional Burgers’ equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decades, there have been great advances in developing high-order compact finite difference schemes for solving partial differential equations and a great deal of research work has been reported [2,4,[6][7][8][9][10][13][14][15]18,19]. Most existing high-order compact schemes are constructed for problems with Dirichlet boundary conditions [6,14] because Dirichlet boundary conditions are simple and straightforward to implement in a high-order compact stencil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, there have been great advances in developing high-order compact finite difference schemes for solving partial differential equations and a great deal of research work has been reported [2,4,[6][7][8][9][10][13][14][15]18,19]. Most existing high-order compact schemes are constructed for problems with Dirichlet boundary conditions [6,14] because Dirichlet boundary conditions are simple and straightforward to implement in a high-order compact stencil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gülsu used restrictive Padé approximation classical implicit finite difference method for the Burgers' equation [15]. Liao applied a fourth-order compact finite difference method to the equation [16]. Sari and Gürarslan defined a sixth-order compact finite difference method for numerical solution of the onedimensional Burgers' equation [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the compact schemes have much smaller numerical dispersion and dissipation errors than traditional finite difference schemes of the same order of accuracy on the same mesh. So far, researchers have developed a variety of compact difference schemes [2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%