2013 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/indcon.2013.6725994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved adaptive Kalman filter for denoising fiber optic gyro drift signal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an efficient and recursive estimator, Kalman filter has been widely used for eliminating the random noise of FOG sensor [ 18 , 25 , 28 , 31 ]. It is a set of mathematical equations to estimate the state of system and minimize the mean squared error of residuals using the prior knowledge about dynamic process and measurement models, in addition to the process and measurement noise.…”
Section: Adaptive Kalman Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an efficient and recursive estimator, Kalman filter has been widely used for eliminating the random noise of FOG sensor [ 18 , 25 , 28 , 31 ]. It is a set of mathematical equations to estimate the state of system and minimize the mean squared error of residuals using the prior knowledge about dynamic process and measurement models, in addition to the process and measurement noise.…”
Section: Adaptive Kalman Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the practicability and to avoid divergent effects, adaptive KF (AKF) methods have been investigated which are based on innovation-based adaptive estimation (IAE) or residual-based adaptive estimation (RAE) [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]. An AKF with double transitive factors is developed in [ 17 , 18 ], where the covariance matrix of predicted state vector is modified by an adaptive factor in stage one and the covariance matrix of measurement noise is modified by another adaptive factor in stage two. However, this method requires that innovation or residual vectors at each time point be in the identical type, spatial dimension and distribution, which is difficult to satisfy in a highly dynamic environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, scholars have carried out a lot of research work, and IFOG stochastic error suppression methods based on low-pass filtering (LPF), wavelet transform (WT), empirical mode decomposition (EMD), Kalman filtering (KF), etc, have been proposed one after another [6][7][8][9][10]. However, LPF, WT, EMD and other methods are not applicable to low-frequency noise analysis (long-time error) [11], while the WT and EMD methods are too complex and difficult to implement for the limited computational resources of SINS, and the real-time performance of the algorithms is not good [12]. As a time-domain filtering method, KF, due to its recursive optimal estimation, has more advantages in applications with high real-time demands and limited computational resources [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional Kalman Filter entails fixed process noise and measurement noise covariance matrix Q and R. The prior knowledge of noise statistics is not enough to represent process noise covariance matrix of a dynamic system precisely. Thus fixed noise covariance can lead to divergent problems [7]. Apart from Kalman Filter methods, SVM(support vector machine) [8] and neural network method [9] are also used to deal with the random errors of MEMS inertial sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%