2023
DOI: 10.3390/s23115292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Ambiguity Resolution Algorithm for Smartphone RTK Positioning

Abstract: Ambiguity resolution based on smartphone GNSS measurements can enable various potential applications that currently remain difficult due to ambiguity biases, especially under kinematic conditions. This study proposes an improved ambiguity resolution algorithm, which uses the search-and-shrink procedure coupled with the methods of the multi-epoch double-differenced residual test and the ambiguity majority tests for candidate vectors and ambiguities. By performing a static experiment with Xiaomi Mi 8, the AR eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 15a compares experimental distributions of the TDDFC metrics from the static GNSS receivers and the flight test data. Therefore, using the well-known carrier phase measurement noise model derived from static ground receivers in [36] may lead to a significant number of false alarms in detecting cycle slips. The effect of tight thresholds not only reduces the average number of carrier phase measurements, but frequent exclusions and re-introduction of satellites into the KF lead to poor convergence performance overall.…”
Section: Performance Improvement Via Proposed Cycle Slip Detection St...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 15a compares experimental distributions of the TDDFC metrics from the static GNSS receivers and the flight test data. Therefore, using the well-known carrier phase measurement noise model derived from static ground receivers in [36] may lead to a significant number of false alarms in detecting cycle slips. The effect of tight thresholds not only reduces the average number of carrier phase measurements, but frequent exclusions and re-introduction of satellites into the KF lead to poor convergence performance overall.…”
Section: Performance Improvement Via Proposed Cycle Slip Detection St...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of tight thresholds not only reduces the average number of carrier phase measurements, but frequent exclusions and re-introduction of satellites into the KF lead to poor convergence performance overall. Figure 15b shows the minimum, maximum, and average number of carrier phase measurements remaining after the proposed cycle slip detectors with threshold in [36] and from Table 3, respectively. It can be clearly seen that with the TDDFC threshold in [36], a large amount of GNSS data from moving UAVs would be declared as a cycle-slipped carrier phase and excluded accordingly.…”
Section: Performance Improvement Via Proposed Cycle Slip Detection St...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The work in [ 8 ] proposed an improved method from traditional Ambiguity Resolution (AR) to achieve centimeter-level smartphone tracking based on a search-and-shrink procedure coupled with the methods of the multi-epoch double-differenced residual. The tests were developed using a Xiaomi Mi 8 in static mode to evaluate smartphone AR efficiency and a Google Pixel 5 (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) in kinematic mode to verify the improvement in smartphone positioning performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the convergence time typically spans between 10 to 30 min, a duration primarily dependent on the surrounding environment [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. In a real-time kinematics (RTK) mode, decimeter or even centimeter positioning accuracy can be realized in static open spaces under ideal conditions [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. However, dynamic positioning in urban environments presents challenges due to observational noise and multipath influences, making ambiguity difficult to fix and reducing the average positioning accuracy to meter levels, thereby yielding suboptimal results [ 10 , 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%