An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo‐absence data

Abstract

Summary 1.Few examples of habitat-modelling studies of rare and endangered species exist in the literature, although from a conservation perspective predicting their distribution would prove particularly useful. Paucity of data and lack of valid absences are the probable reasons for this shortcoming. Analytic solutions to accommodate the lack of absence include the ecological niche factor analysis (ENFA) and the use of generalized linear models (GLM) with simulated pseudo-absences. 2. In this study we tested a new approach to generating pseudo-absences, based on a preliminary ENFA habitat suitability (HS) map, for the endangered species Eryngium alpinum . This method of generating pseudo-absences was compared with two others: (i) use of a GLM with pseudo-absences generated totally at random, and (ii) use of an ENFA only. 3. The influence of two different spatial resolutions (i.e. grain) was also assessed for tackling the dilemma of quality (grain) vs. quantity (number of occurrences). Each combination of the three above-mentioned methods with the two grains generated a distinct HS map. 4. Four evaluation measures were used for comparing these HS maps: total deviance explained, best kappa, Gini coefficient and minimal predicted area (MPA). The last is a new evaluation criterion proposed in this study. 5. Results showed that (i) GLM models using ENFA-weighted pseudo-absence provide better results, except for the MPA value, and that (ii) quality (spatial resolution and locational accuracy) of the data appears to be more important than quantity (number of occurrences). Furthermore, the proposed MPA value is suggested as a useful measure of model evaluation when used to complement classical statistical measures. 6. Synthesis and applications. We suggest that the use of ENFA-weighted pseudoabsence is a possible way to enhance the quality of GLM-based potential distribution maps and that data quality (i.e. spatial resolution) prevails over quantity (i.e. number of data). Increased accuracy of potential distribution maps could help to define better suitable areas for species protection and reintroduction.Key-words : ecological niche factor analysis (ENFA), Eryngium alpinum , generalized linear model (GLM), habitat suitability (HS) model, minimal predicted area (MPA), spatial resolution vs. data size.

An overview of recent remote sensing and GIS based research in ecological informatics

“…In recent years species distribution modelling has become even more popular, especially given its role in predicting impacts of variables such as climate change on species and biodiversity. Species distribution models have, however, been used in a variety of applications including facilitating the selection of sites for species re-introduction (Pearce and Lindenmayer, 1998), design of field surveys (Engler et al, 2004), design of reserves (Li et al, 1999) and impacts of climate change (Nativi et al, 2009). Nonethe-less, the latter application has been a focus of considerable recent attention in the literature.…”

A simple post-hoc method to add spatial context to predictive species distribution models

“…91). Although five species had marginally less than the recommended 50 presences (Stockwell and Peterson, 2002;) the fine spatial resolution in this study had the potential to produce better results with fewer presences than that recommended at coarser resolutions (Engler et al, 2004).…”

Generating an agricultural risk map based on limited ecological information: A case study using Sicyos angulatus

“…To improve the accuracy of predictions, ecological information could be incorporated, such as population growth rates, habitat suitability, and mortality rates (Moles et al 2008). Furthermore, several techniques involving species distribution models would allow the incorporation of several ecological parameters (Engler et al 2004;Guisan and Thuiller 2005). In addition, refining the geographic grain and extent of the model is very important to both implementation of the management plan and field-level activities (Foxcroft et al 2009;Osawa et al 2011;Akasaka et al 2012).…”