1993
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889893005643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved deviation parameter for the simulation of dynamical X-ray diffraction on epitaxic heterostructures

Abstract: X‐ray diffraction rocking curves of a strained‐layer superlattice structure have been measured at symmetric and asymmetric Bragg reflections and compared with simulated diffraction curves. The calculations are based on dynamical scattering theory. The experimental and theoretical curves exhibit a discrepancy with regard to the angular position of the higher‐order satellite reflections, which can be removed by introducing a new expression for the deviation parameter in the dynamical diffraction theory. The impr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are caused by the fact that the ͑422͒ glancing-out reflection for a ͓100͔-oriented GaAs crystal is strongly asymmetric, and some approximations of the CDT are not verified. This result was evidenced also by Zaus, 37 who introduced an improved expression of the deviation parameter in the CDT in order to take into account the asymptotic sphericity of the dispersion surface for strong glancing-out asymmetric Bragg reflections. However, this simplified approach to the problem of considering only two roots of the secular equation leads to an improved theory that is not generally valid.…”
Section: Comparison With the Conventional Dynamical X-ray Theorymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These findings are caused by the fact that the ͑422͒ glancing-out reflection for a ͓100͔-oriented GaAs crystal is strongly asymmetric, and some approximations of the CDT are not verified. This result was evidenced also by Zaus, 37 who introduced an improved expression of the deviation parameter in the CDT in order to take into account the asymptotic sphericity of the dispersion surface for strong glancing-out asymmetric Bragg reflections. However, this simplified approach to the problem of considering only two roots of the secular equation leads to an improved theory that is not generally valid.…”
Section: Comparison With the Conventional Dynamical X-ray Theorymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…For this comparison, the expression for q, recently reported by Zaus (1993), was used, which proved more effective than (2) for large deviations from the Bragg condition. Moreover, the above f parameter [(3)], suitable only for e_L values below 1%, was replaced by the exact expression already used in a previous study (Servidori, Cembali, Fabbri & Zani, 1992) for the general case of an asymmetric reflection.…”
Section: Comparison Between Approximate and More Exact Expressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The angular separation between the layer and substrate peak Do L;S is given by [29] Do L;S ¼ k 1 e > þ k 2 e J ; ðB:3Þ k 1 ¼ cos 2 F tan W þ 1 2 sin 2F; ðB:4Þ k 2 ¼ sin 2 F tan W À 1 2 sin 2F; ðB:5Þ…”
Section: Appendix Bmentioning
confidence: 99%