2013 International Conference on Information Technology and Applications 2013
DOI: 10.1109/ita.2013.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved DV-Hop Localization Algorithm in Wireless Sensor Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, the unknowing node coordinates are computed through the proposed algorithmnamed hyperbolic and mid-perpendicular with centroid (HAMPC)-by incorporating an error correction factor [34] instead of the trilateration technique used in other DV-Hop localization methods. Similar to other DV-Hop methods, the proposed approach also has the three basic steps-i.e., a hop count calculation, followed by an average hop size determination, and then at last a distance estimation technique.…”
Section: Proposed Localization Technique Using Improved Dv-hop Based On Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now, the unknowing node coordinates are computed through the proposed algorithmnamed hyperbolic and mid-perpendicular with centroid (HAMPC)-by incorporating an error correction factor [34] instead of the trilateration technique used in other DV-Hop localization methods. Similar to other DV-Hop methods, the proposed approach also has the three basic steps-i.e., a hop count calculation, followed by an average hop size determination, and then at last a distance estimation technique.…”
Section: Proposed Localization Technique Using Improved Dv-hop Based On Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the use of a correction for the distance and average network hop distance, it yields the best results. The letter by C. Fu et al [34] improved the conventional DV-Hop and proposed the Fu DV-Hop, which changes the second and third steps of the conventional DV-Hop. This approach improves the result by correcting the distance, finding the weight for anchor nodes, and, in the third step, validating the coordinates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range-based algorithms mainly include TOA localization [1], TDOA localization [2], AOA localization [3], RSSI localization [4] and so on [5][6][7]. The range-free algorithms mainly include Weighted Centroid localization [8], DV-hop localization [9][10][11], RSS-based localization [12] and so on [13]. In the literature [14], there are also some other localization algorithms about mobile anchor node assisted localization in static wireless sensor networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%